linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
	Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@selhorst.net>,
	Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@gmail.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: drop chip->is_open and chip->duration_adjusted
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:54:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161116225412.gzvw7f5snnovk7na@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161116052832.GB6044@obsidianresearch.com>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:28:32PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 09:11:54PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> > How strong is your opposition here? I do not see any exceptional damage
> > done but see some subtle but still significant benefits.
> 
> It seems OK, but I never like seeing locking made less clear - this
> should be manageable, and there isn't a performance concern with tpm
> either..

OK good to hear. I'm using this as part of my RM patch set. Just wanted
to get some feedback for this patch. Not for the next rel.

/Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-16 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-14 23:44 [PATCH] tpm: drop chip->is_open and chip->duration_adjusted Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-11-15  4:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-15  5:11   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-11-16  5:28     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-11-16 22:54       ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2016-11-17 10:40 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Nayna
2016-11-17 17:36   ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161116225412.gzvw7f5snnovk7na@intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=christophe.ricard@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=tpmdd@selhorst.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).