From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "Daniel Mack" <daniel@zonque.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>, "Jann Horn" <jann@thejh.net>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>, "David Ahern" <dsahern@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Thomas Graf" <tgraf@suug.ch>,
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Linux API" <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Potential issues (security and otherwise) with the current cgroup-bpf API
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:01:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161221040147.GA23140@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVhjiRMSkvmMDgq_O7niWHiRcvjq-my8nYS9_s8JDye1g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:49:25AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> FWIW, everywhere I say ioctl(), the bpf() syscall would be okay, too.
> >> It doesn't make a semantic difference, except that I dislike
> >> BPF_PROG_DETACH because that particular command isn't BPF-specific at
> >> all.
> >
> > Well, I think it is; it pops the bpf program from a target and drops the
> > reference on it. It's not much code, but it's certainly bpf-specific.
>
> I mean the interface isn't bpf-specific. If there was something that
> wasn't bpf attached to the target, you'd still want an API to detach
> it.
This discussion won't go anywhere while you keep thinking that this api
has to be generalized. As I explained several times earlier
BPF_CGROUP_INET_SOCK_CREATE hook is bpf specific. There is nothing
in the kernel that can take advantage of it today, so by definition
the hook is bpf specific. Period. Saying that something in the future
may come along that would want to use that is like saying I want
to design the generic steering wheel for any car that will ever need it.
Hence if you want to change 'target_fd' in BPF_PROG_ATTACH/DETACH cmds
from being fd of open("cgroupdir") to fd of open("cgroupdir/cgroup.bpf")
file inside it then I'm ok with that.
All other proposals with non-extensible ioctls() and crazy text based
per-hook permissions is nack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-17 18:18 Potential issues (security and otherwise) with the current cgroup-bpf API Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-17 19:26 ` Mickaël Salaün
2016-12-17 20:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-19 20:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-19 21:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 0:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 0:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 1:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 1:44 ` David Ahern
2016-12-20 1:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 2:52 ` David Ahern
2016-12-20 3:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 4:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 5:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 5:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-03 10:25 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-16 1:19 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-17 13:03 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-17 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-17 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-17 20:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-18 22:18 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-19 9:00 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-20 3:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 3:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 4:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 10:21 ` Daniel Mack
2016-12-20 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 18:36 ` Daniel Mack
2016-12-20 18:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-21 4:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2016-12-20 1:34 ` David Miller
2016-12-20 1:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-12-20 4:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-12-20 5:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-17 5:18 Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-18 22:41 ` Potential issues (security and otherwise) with the current cgroup-bpf API Tejun Heo
2017-01-19 0:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-19 0:59 ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-19 2:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-20 2:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-20 4:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-23 4:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-01-23 20:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-03 21:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-02-03 23:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-04 17:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-01-19 1:01 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161221040147.GA23140@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@zonque.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).