linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger
@ 2017-01-06  6:07 Michał Kępień
  2017-01-06 12:22 ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Kępień @ 2017-01-06  6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg, David S . Miller
  Cc: Михаил
	Кринкин,
	linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

Add a new "global" (i.e. not per-rfkill device) LED trigger, rfkill-any,
which may be useful on laptops with a single "radio LED" and multiple
radio transmitters.  The trigger is meant to turn a LED on whenever
there is at least one radio transmitter active and turn it off
otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl>
---
Changes from v3:

  - Revert introducing a new bitfield and instead defer LED event firing
    to a work queue to prevent conditional locking and ensure the
    trigger can really be used from any context.  This also voids the
    need to take rfkill_global_mutex before calling rfkill_set_block()
    in rfkill_resume().

Changes from v2:

  - Handle the global mutex properly when rfkill_set_{hw,sw}_state() or
    rfkill_set_states() is called from within an rfkill callback.  v2
    always tried to lock the global mutex in such a case, which led to a
    deadlock when an rfkill driver called one of the above functions
    from its query or set_block callback.  This is solved by defining a
    new bitfield, RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_HASLOCK, which is set before the above
    callbacks are invoked and cleared afterwards; the functions listed
    above use this bitfield to tell rfkill_any_led_trigger_event()
    whether the global mutex is currently held or not.
    RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_SETCALL cannot be reused for this purpose as setting
    it before invoking the query callback would cause any calls to
    rfkill_set_sw_state() made from within that callback to work on
    RFKILL_BLOCK_SW_PREV instead of RFKILL_BLOCK_SW and thus change the
    way rfkill_set_block() behaves.

  - As rfkill_any_led_trigger_event() now takes a boolean argument which
    tells it whether the global mutex was already taken by the caller,
    all calls to __rfkill_any_led_trigger_event() outside
    rfkill_any_led_trigger_event() have been replaced with calls to
    rfkill_any_led_trigger_event(true).

Changes from v1:

  - take rfkill_global_mutex before calling rfkill_set_block() in
    rfkill_resume(); the need for doing this was previously obviated by
    908209c ("rfkill: don't impose global states on resume"), but given
    that __rfkill_any_led_trigger_event() is called from
    rfkill_set_block() unconditionally, each caller of the latter needs
    to take care of locking rfkill_global_mutex,

  - declare __rfkill_any_led_trigger_event() even when
    CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS=n to prevent implicit declaration errors,

  - remove the #ifdef surrounding rfkill_any_led_trigger_{,un}register()
    calls to prevent compilation warnings about functions and a label
    being defined but not used,

  - move the rfkill_any_led_trigger_register() call in rfkill_init()
    before the rfkill_handler_init() call to avoid the need to call
    rfkill_handler_exit() from rfkill_init() and thus prevent a section
    mismatch.

 net/rfkill/core.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index afa4f71b4c7b..2064c3a35ef8 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -176,6 +176,50 @@ static void rfkill_led_trigger_unregister(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 {
 	led_trigger_unregister(&rfkill->led_trigger);
 }
+
+static struct led_trigger rfkill_any_led_trigger;
+static struct work_struct rfkill_any_work;
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_worker(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	enum led_brightness brightness = LED_OFF;
+	struct rfkill *rfkill;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
+	list_for_each_entry(rfkill, &rfkill_list, node) {
+		if (!(rfkill->state & RFKILL_BLOCK_ANY)) {
+			brightness = LED_FULL;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
+
+	led_trigger_event(&rfkill_any_led_trigger, brightness);
+}
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_event(void)
+{
+	schedule_work(&rfkill_any_work);
+}
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_activate(struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
+{
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
+}
+
+static int rfkill_any_led_trigger_register(void)
+{
+	INIT_WORK(&rfkill_any_work, rfkill_any_led_trigger_worker);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger.name = "rfkill-any";
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger.activate = rfkill_any_led_trigger_activate;
+	return led_trigger_register(&rfkill_any_led_trigger);
+}
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister(void)
+{
+	led_trigger_unregister(&rfkill_any_led_trigger);
+	cancel_work_sync(&rfkill_any_work);
+}
 #else
 static void rfkill_led_trigger_event(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 {
@@ -189,6 +233,19 @@ static inline int rfkill_led_trigger_register(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 static inline void rfkill_led_trigger_unregister(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 {
 }
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_event(void)
+{
+}
+
+static int rfkill_any_led_trigger_register(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister(void)
+{
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS */
 
 static void rfkill_fill_event(struct rfkill_event *ev, struct rfkill *rfkill,
@@ -297,6 +354,7 @@ static void rfkill_set_block(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags);
 
 	rfkill_led_trigger_event(rfkill);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 
 	if (prev != curr)
 		rfkill_event(rfkill);
@@ -477,6 +535,7 @@ bool rfkill_set_hw_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rfkill->lock, flags);
 
 	rfkill_led_trigger_event(rfkill);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 
 	if (rfkill->registered && prev != blocked)
 		schedule_work(&rfkill->uevent_work);
@@ -520,6 +579,7 @@ bool rfkill_set_sw_state(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool blocked)
 		schedule_work(&rfkill->uevent_work);
 
 	rfkill_led_trigger_event(rfkill);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 
 	return blocked;
 }
@@ -569,6 +629,7 @@ void rfkill_set_states(struct rfkill *rfkill, bool sw, bool hw)
 			schedule_work(&rfkill->uevent_work);
 
 		rfkill_led_trigger_event(rfkill);
+		rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rfkill_set_states);
@@ -985,6 +1046,7 @@ int __must_check rfkill_register(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 #endif
 	}
 
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 	rfkill_send_events(rfkill, RFKILL_OP_ADD);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
@@ -1017,6 +1079,7 @@ void rfkill_unregister(struct rfkill *rfkill)
 	mutex_lock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
 	rfkill_send_events(rfkill, RFKILL_OP_DEL);
 	list_del_init(&rfkill->node);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_event();
 	mutex_unlock(&rfkill_global_mutex);
 
 	rfkill_led_trigger_unregister(rfkill);
@@ -1269,6 +1332,10 @@ static int __init rfkill_init(void)
 	if (error)
 		goto error_misc;
 
+	error = rfkill_any_led_trigger_register();
+	if (error)
+		goto error_led_trigger;
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT
 	error = rfkill_handler_init();
 	if (error)
@@ -1279,8 +1346,10 @@ static int __init rfkill_init(void)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT
 error_input:
-	misc_deregister(&rfkill_miscdev);
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister();
 #endif
+error_led_trigger:
+	misc_deregister(&rfkill_miscdev);
 error_misc:
 	class_unregister(&rfkill_class);
 error_class:
@@ -1293,6 +1362,7 @@ static void __exit rfkill_exit(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_RFKILL_INPUT
 	rfkill_handler_exit();
 #endif
+	rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister();
 	misc_deregister(&rfkill_miscdev);
 	class_unregister(&rfkill_class);
 }
-- 
2.11.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger
  2017-01-06  6:07 [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger Michał Kępień
@ 2017-01-06 12:22 ` Johannes Berg
  2017-01-06 19:20   ` Michał Kępień
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2017-01-06 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michał Kępień, David S . Miller
  Cc: Михаил
	Кринкин,
	linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 07:07 +0100, Michał Kępień wrote:
> Add a new "global" (i.e. not per-rfkill device) LED trigger, rfkill-
> any,
> which may be useful on laptops with a single "radio LED" and multiple
> radio transmitters.  The trigger is meant to turn a LED on whenever
> there is at least one radio transmitter active and turn it off
> otherwise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl>
> ---
> Changes from v3:
> 
>   - Revert introducing a new bitfield and instead defer LED event
> firing
>     to a work queue to prevent conditional locking and ensure the
>     trigger can really be used from any context.  This also voids the
>     need to take rfkill_global_mutex before calling
> rfkill_set_block()
>     in rfkill_resume().

Looks better, but

> +static struct work_struct rfkill_any_work;

At least on module exit you need to cancel this work.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger
  2017-01-06 12:22 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2017-01-06 19:20   ` Michał Kępień
  2017-01-09 10:39     ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michał Kępień @ 2017-01-06 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Johannes Berg
  Cc: David S . Miller,
	Михаил
	Кринкин,
	linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel

> On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 07:07 +0100, Michał Kępień wrote:
> > Add a new "global" (i.e. not per-rfkill device) LED trigger, rfkill-
> > any,
> > which may be useful on laptops with a single "radio LED" and multiple
> > radio transmitters.  The trigger is meant to turn a LED on whenever
> > there is at least one radio transmitter active and turn it off
> > otherwise.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michał Kępień <kernel@kempniu.pl>
> > ---
> > Changes from v3:
> > 
> >   - Revert introducing a new bitfield and instead defer LED event
> > firing
> >     to a work queue to prevent conditional locking and ensure the
> >     trigger can really be used from any context.  This also voids the
> >     need to take rfkill_global_mutex before calling
> > rfkill_set_block()
> >     in rfkill_resume().
> 
> Looks better, but
> 
> > +static struct work_struct rfkill_any_work;
> 
> At least on module exit you need to cancel this work.

It is cancelled in rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister().  It seemed
fitting to do it this way as rfkill_any_work is initialized in
rfkill_any_led_trigger_register().  And if CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS=n,
rfkill_any_work is neither initialized nor scheduled, so we should be
good as well.  Am I missing something?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Kępień

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger
  2017-01-06 19:20   ` Michał Kępień
@ 2017-01-09 10:39     ` Johannes Berg
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2017-01-09 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michał Kępień
  Cc: David S . Miller,
	Михаил
	Кринкин,
	linux-wireless, netdev, linux-kernel


> > Looks better, but
> > 
> > > +static struct work_struct rfkill_any_work;
> > 
> > At least on module exit you need to cancel this work.
> 
> It is cancelled in rfkill_any_led_trigger_unregister().  It seemed
> fitting to do it this way as rfkill_any_work is initialized in
> rfkill_any_led_trigger_register().  And if CONFIG_RFKILL_LEDS=n,
> rfkill_any_work is neither initialized nor scheduled, so we should be
> good as well.  Am I missing something?

No, I just missed that, sorry.

Applied the patch now.

johannes

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-09 10:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-06  6:07 [PATCH v4] rfkill: Add rfkill-any LED trigger Michał Kępień
2017-01-06 12:22 ` Johannes Berg
2017-01-06 19:20   ` Michał Kępień
2017-01-09 10:39     ` Johannes Berg

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).