From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: "Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@savoirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>,
"Andrey Smirnov" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: make "label" property optional for dsa2
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:07:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170109160744.GE1862@nanopsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109160019.GF25588@lunn.ch>
Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:00:19PM CET, andrew@lunn.ch wrote:
>> > No. That should be unique within one switch. In mlxsw we name it "p1",
>> > "p2", ...
>> >
>> > The final netdev names are:
>> > enp3s0np1, enp3s0np2, ...
>>
>
>mlxsw are pci devices, so it follows this convention, i think:
>
> * [P<domain>]p<bus>s<slot>[f<function>][n<phys_port_name>|d<dev_port>]
> * PCI geographical location
>
>Our devices are not on PCI. So they won't follow this. I've no idea
>what they actually follow, since some are MDIO devices, some are SPI
>devices, some are memory mapped.
Got it. We just have to make sure udev names them appropriately.
>
>I'm not against making the label option, but i do want to better
>understand what we get as a result, just to make sure it is sensible.
>
>Vivien, could you try a recent udev and see what happens?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-08 23:15 [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: make "label" property optional for dsa2 Vivien Didelot
2017-01-08 23:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-01-09 2:56 ` Vivien Didelot
2017-01-09 7:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-01-09 15:04 ` Vivien Didelot
2017-01-09 15:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-01-09 15:45 ` Vivien Didelot
2017-01-09 16:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2017-01-09 16:07 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2017-01-09 16:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-01-09 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-09 17:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-01-09 18:06 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-10 9:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-01-10 17:58 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-11 7:26 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170109160744.GE1862@nanopsycho \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=uwe@kleine-koenig.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).