linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, axboe@fb.com, vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 05/17] blk-throttle: add upgrade logic for LIMIT_LOW state
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 14:46:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170109194600.GI12827@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170109184053.GG12827@mtj.duckdns.org>

Hello, again.

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 01:40:53PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I think it'd be great to explain the above.  It was a bit difficult
> for me to follow.  It's also interesting because we're tying state
> transitions for both read and write together.  blk-throtl has been
> handling reads and writes independently, now the mode switching from
> low to max is shared across reads and writes.  I suppose it could be
> fine but would it be complex to separate them out?  It's weird to make
> this one state shared across reads and writes while not for others or
> was this sharing intentional?

I thought more about it and as the low limit is regulated by latency,
it makes sense to make the state shared across reads and writes;
otherwise, IOs in one direction could easily mess up the other
direction.  Can you please document that this is an intentional design
and explain the rationale tho?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-09 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-15 20:32 [PATCH V5 00/17] blk-throttle: add .low limit Shaohua Li
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 01/17] blk-throttle: use U64_MAX/UINT_MAX to replace -1 Shaohua Li
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 02/17] blk-throttle: prepare support multiple limits Shaohua Li
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 03/17] blk-throttle: add .low interface Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 16:35   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 04/17] blk-throttle: configure bps/iops limit for cgroup in low limit Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 17:35   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 05/17] blk-throttle: add upgrade logic for LIMIT_LOW state Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 18:40   ` Tejun Heo
2017-01-09 19:46     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 06/17] blk-throttle: add downgrade logic Shaohua Li
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 07/17] blk-throttle: make sure expire time isn't too big Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 19:54   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:32 ` [PATCH V5 08/17] blk-throttle: make throtl_slice tunable Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 20:08   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 09/17] blk-throttle: detect completed idle cgroup Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 20:13   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 10/17] blk-throttle: make bandwidth change smooth Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 20:28   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 11/17] blk-throttle: add a simple idle detection Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 20:56   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 12/17] blk-throttle: add interface to configure idle time threshold Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 20:58   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 13/17] blk-throttle: ignore idle cgroup limit Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:01   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 14/17] blk-throttle: add interface for per-cgroup target latency Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:14   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 15/17] block: track request size in blk_issue_stat Shaohua Li
2016-12-16  2:01   ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-09 21:17   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 16/17] blk-throttle: add a mechanism to estimate IO latency Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:39   ` Tejun Heo
2016-12-15 20:33 ` [PATCH V5 17/17] blk-throttle: add latency target support Shaohua Li
2017-01-09 21:46 ` [PATCH V5 00/17] blk-throttle: add .low limit Tejun Heo
2017-01-09 22:27   ` Shaohua Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170109194600.GI12827@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).