linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
	eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf: Allow kernel filters on cpu events
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:38:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170126213855.GC1991@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170126094057.13805-4-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:40:57AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> While supporting file-based address filters for cpu events requires some
> extra context switch handling, kernel address filters are easy, since the
> kernel mapping is preserved across address spaces. It is also useful as
> it permits tracing scheduling paths of the kernel.
> 
> This patch allows setting up kernel filters for cpu events.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h |  2 ++
>  kernel/events/core.c       | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index fcb37c81ca..f4ea0600b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -486,6 +486,7 @@ struct perf_addr_filter {
>   * @list:	list of filters for this event
>   * @lock:	spinlock that serializes accesses to the @list and event's
>   *		(and its children's) filter generations.
> + * @nr_file_filters:	number of file-based filters
>   *
>   * A child event will use parent's @list (and therefore @lock), so they are
>   * bundled together; see perf_event_addr_filters().
> @@ -493,6 +494,7 @@ struct perf_addr_filter {
>  struct perf_addr_filters_head {
>  	struct list_head	list;
>  	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> +	unsigned int		nr_file_filters;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 36770a13ef..2eeb8fec2f 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -8093,6 +8093,9 @@ static void perf_event_addr_filters_apply(struct perf_event *event)
>  	if (task == TASK_TOMBSTONE)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (!ifh->nr_file_filters)
> +		return;

Is this mandatory or an optimisation to avoid circling through a list of filters
that don't included user space files?

> +
>  	mm = get_task_mm(event->ctx->task);
>  	if (!mm)
>  		goto restart;
> @@ -8269,6 +8272,18 @@ perf_event_parse_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *fstr,
>  				if (!filename)
>  					goto fail;
>  
> +				/*
> +				 * For now, we only support file-based filters
> +				 * in per-task events; doing so for CPU-wide
> +				 * events requires additional context switching
> +				 * trickery, since same object code will be
> +				 * mapped at different virtual addresses in
> +				 * different processes.
> +				 */
> +				ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +				if (!event->ctx->task)
> +					goto fail_free_name;
> +
>  				/* look up the path and grab its inode */
>  				ret = kern_path(filename, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, &path);
>  				if (ret)
> @@ -8284,6 +8299,8 @@ perf_event_parse_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *fstr,
>  				    !S_ISREG(filter->inode->i_mode))
>  					/* free_filters_list() will iput() */
>  					goto fail;
> +
> +				event->addr_filters.nr_file_filters++;
>  			}
>  
>  			/* ready to consume more filters */
> @@ -8323,24 +8340,13 @@ perf_event_set_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *filter_str)
>  	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(event->parent))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * For now, we only support filtering in per-task events; doing so
> -	 * for CPU-wide events requires additional context switching trickery,
> -	 * since same object code will be mapped at different virtual
> -	 * addresses in different processes.
> -	 */
> -	if (!event->ctx->task)
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
>  	ret = perf_event_parse_addr_filter(event, filter_str, &filters);
>  	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> +		goto fail_clear_files;
>  
>  	ret = event->pmu->addr_filters_validate(&filters);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		free_filters_list(&filters);
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto fail_free_filters;
>  
>  	/* remove existing filters, if any */
>  	perf_addr_filters_splice(event, &filters);
> @@ -8349,6 +8355,14 @@ perf_event_set_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *filter_str)
>  	perf_event_for_each_child(event, perf_event_addr_filters_apply);
>  
>  	return ret;
> +
> +fail_free_filters:
> +	free_filters_list(&filters);
> +
> +fail_clear_files:
> +	event->addr_filters.nr_file_filters = 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static int perf_event_set_filter(struct perf_event *event, void __user *arg)
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-26 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-26  9:40 [PATCH 0/3] perf: Updates for address filters Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf, pt, coresight: Clean up address filter structure Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26 13:02   ` kbuild test robot
2017-01-26 13:24     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26 18:26   ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-01-27 12:12     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-27 17:17       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-01 12:46         ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-02-01 21:33           ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-01 22:15             ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-02 10:42               ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-02-02 17:36                 ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-02 16:22             ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-02-07 17:50               ` Mathieu Poirier
     [not found]                 ` <20180117123137.3hlmudzu5eogl53n@ukko.fi.intel.com>
2018-01-18 16:59                   ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-18 17:06                     ` Will Deacon
2018-01-18 18:19                       ` Mathieu Poirier
2018-01-19 18:50                   ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26 18:32   ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-10  8:33   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26  9:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf: Allow kernel filters on cpu events Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-26 21:38   ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2017-01-27 12:31     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-01-27 17:38       ` Mathieu Poirier
2017-02-10  8:07   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-14 12:59     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-02-10  8:34   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Allow kernel filters on CPU events tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170126213855.GC1991@linaro.org \
    --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).