From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
sudeep.holla@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:29:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170130122901.GA25681@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119143757.14537-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>
Hi,
ping.
I'd need more advice on this set, especially on how and if patch 6 could fly.
Thanks,
- Juri
On 19/01/17 14:37, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity
> information. This set of patches proposes a solution (based on Will's,
> Catalin's and Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single
> place: drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally
> compiling it for arm and arm64 only).
>
> First 5 patches are actually fixes for the current code.
>
> Patch 6 is the actual refactoring.
>
> Last patch removes one of the extern symbols by changing a bit the now common
> code. We still remain with some other externs, which are not nice. Moving them
> in some header file solves the issue, should I just create a new include/
> linux/arch_topology.h file and move them there?
>
> The set is based on top of linux/master (4.10-rc4 fb1d8e0e2c50) and it is also
> available from:
>
> git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_factorize
>
> Best,
>
> - Juri
>
> Juri Lelli (7):
> Documentation: arm: fix wrong reference number in DT definition
> Documentation/ABI: add information about cpu_capacity
> arm: fix return value of parse_cpu_capacity
> arm: remove wrong CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL ifdef
> arm64: remove wrong CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL ifdef
> arm, arm64: factorize common cpu capacity default code
> arm,arm64,drivers: reduce scope of cap_parsing_failed
>
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 7 +
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt | 4 +-
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 216 +------------------
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 218 +------------------
> drivers/base/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/base/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 9 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 427 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/base/arch_topology.c
>
> --
> 2.10.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-19 14:37 [PATCH 0/7] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: arm: fix wrong reference number in DT definition Juri Lelli
2017-01-21 20:55 ` Rob Herring
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/7] Documentation/ABI: add information about cpu_capacity Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm: fix return value of parse_cpu_capacity Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm: remove wrong CONFIG_PROC_SYSCTL ifdef Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: " Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm, arm64: factorize common cpu capacity default code Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-19 15:51 ` Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 16:00 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-01-20 10:42 ` Juri Lelli
2017-01-19 14:37 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm,arm64,drivers: reduce scope of cap_parsing_failed Juri Lelli
2017-01-30 12:29 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-01-30 17:51 ` [PATCH 0/7] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code Catalin Marinas
2017-01-30 18:21 ` Juri Lelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170130122901.GA25681@e106622-lin \
--to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).