From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Use zfree() instead of free() in parse-events.c
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:39:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170130123929.GA11887@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6d1a248-daee-afa9-c71c-5688aa76afdb@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:37:58PM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
>
>
> On 01/30/2017 06:01 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 02:23:38PM +0900, Taeung Song wrote:
> > > Currently there are several parts not checking NULL
> > > after allocating with zalloc() or asigning NULL value
> > > to a pointer variable after doing free().
> > >
> > > So I fill in code checking NULL and
> > > use zfree() instead of free().
> >
> > can't see directly reasons for zfree usage,
> > but it looks reasonable.. do you have any
> > crash reports due to missing zfree?
>
> No, Just I read source code util/parse-events.c
> And I found several insufficiency, shortcoming
> not checking NULL or assigning NULL value to a pointer
> variable after free().
> So, I think we can use zfree() insteadof free()+assigning NULL.
ok
>
> Change commit message to be more appropriate ?
that's always good idea ;-)
thanks,
jirka
>
> Thanks,
> Taeung
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-30 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-30 5:23 [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Use zfree() instead of free() in parse-events.c Taeung Song
2017-01-30 5:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf evsel: Check for NULL before perf_evsel__is_bpf_output() Taeung Song
2017-01-30 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-01-30 10:26 ` Taeung Song
2017-01-30 9:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Use zfree() instead of free() in parse-events.c Jiri Olsa
2017-01-30 10:37 ` Taeung Song
2017-01-30 12:39 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170130123929.GA11887@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).