linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] device property: export code duplicating array of property entries
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 07:15:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170203151552.GC3868@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486122330.2133.374.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 01:45:30PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 17:41 -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > When augmenting ACPI-enumerated devices with additional property data
> > based
> > on DMI info, a module has often several potential property sets, with
> > only
> > one being active on a given box. In order to save memory it should be
> > possible to mark everything and __initdata or __initconst, execute DMI
> > match early, and duplicate relevant properties. Then kernel will
> > discard
> > the rest of them.
> > 
> 
> Here you again rewrote the code you rewrote in previous patch.
> Please, remove those hunks in previous patch and rebase this one on top
> of the result.

I do no see the point really. If I am not exposing the new APIs then
there is no point in touching the code. If I am creating new API then I
do not want to go through contortion of producing something similar to
the old code flow just to "fix" it in the subsequent patch.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-03 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-03  1:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] Export APIs to copy device properties & more Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03  1:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] device property: allow to constify properties Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03 11:40   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-03 15:09     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03  1:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] device property: constify property arrays values Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03 11:43   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-03 15:12     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03  1:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] device property: export code duplicating array of property entries Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03 11:45   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-03 15:15     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2017-02-03  1:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] i2c: allow specify device properties in i2c_board_info Dmitry Torokhov
2017-02-03 11:46   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-02-07 12:44   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-02-07 13:25   ` Wolfram Sang
2017-02-09 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] Export APIs to copy device properties & more Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170203151552.GC3868@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).