linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:40:08 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170301144008.3ocnbvry4sbl3cnu@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3C2YMDEGFydAusyuXs-HAuFt80P=H8ar+Vu3mDCpNtuA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:45:03AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:51:46 AM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 3) 0xFC244C03-config:
> >>> drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_main.o: warning: objtool: fnic_log_q_error() falls through to next function fnic_handle_link_event()
> >>> drivers/scsi/snic/snic_res.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section
> >>>
> >>> These look like another bad gcc bug which is truncating functions:
> >>
> >> Same bug for both of them?
> >
> > I ran into this one again today, after updating to the latest gcc-7.0.1:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.o: warning: objtool:
> > rxe_responder()+0xfe: sibling call from callable instruction with
> > changed frame pointer
> >
> > Josh, did you get around to updating objtool the last time I reported it, or
> > is it still the same problem? If this is a new variation, I can provide more
> > details about the failure, otherwise I'll just ignore it for now.
> 
> Actually, something must have changed in gcc since last month, I also
> just got a report in another file:
> 
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-img-scb.o: warning: objtool: img_i2c_probe()
> falls through to next function img_i2c_read_fifo()

This one looks like it could be related to some recent objtool changes
which affect how it interprets 'ud2'.  Which commit were you testing
with?  Can you provide the .config file, and the object file if it's not
too big?

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-01 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-10 12:56 [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-10 20:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11  8:08   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11 12:20     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 13:30       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11 15:05         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 15:51           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-11 20:38             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-12 13:01               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 12:46               ` Another gcc corruption bug (was Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings) Josh Poimboeuf
2016-10-13 17:57                 ` Denys Vlasenko
2016-10-13 20:15                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01  9:34               ` [PATCH] [RFC] x86: avoid -mtune=atom for objtool warnings Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01  9:45                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:40                   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-03-01 15:27                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 16:53                       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 22:05                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 22:42                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02  1:03                           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02  6:31                             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 12:49                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 13:46                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 14:08                                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 14:46                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-02 22:49                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 23:05                               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-03  8:58                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-03 11:27                                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-01 14:31                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-01 15:21                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 18:25                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 22:43                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-03-02 22:57                         ` [PATCH] objtool: fix another gcc jump table detection issue Josh Poimboeuf
2017-03-02 23:01                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-11  1:53 ` [PATCH] objtool: support '-mtune=atom' stack frame setup instruction Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170301144008.3ocnbvry4sbl3cnu@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).