linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:23:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306182300.d66f137aa17f98a100dbbcd9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161214000732.1710-3-alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>

On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:07:32 +0100
Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com> wrote:

> An sdt probe can be associated with arguments but they were not passed
> to the user probe tracing interface (uprobe_events); this patch adapts
> the sdt argument descriptors according to the uprobe input format.
> 
> As the uprobe parser does not support scaled address mode, perf will
> skip arguments which cannot be adapted to the uprobe format.
> 
> Here are the results:
> 
> $ perf buildid-cache -v --add test_sdt
> $ perf probe -x test_sdt sdt_libfoo:table_frob
> $ perf probe -x test_sdt sdt_libfoo:table_diddle
> $ perf record -e sdt_libfoo:table_frob -e sdt_libfoo:table_diddle test_sdt
> $ perf script
> test_sdt  ...   666.255678:   sdt_libfoo:table_frob: (4004d7) arg0=0 arg1=0
> test_sdt  ...   666.255683: sdt_libfoo:table_diddle: (40051a) arg0=0 arg1=0
> test_sdt  ...   666.255686:   sdt_libfoo:table_frob: (4004d7) arg0=1 arg1=2
> test_sdt  ...   666.255689: sdt_libfoo:table_diddle: (40051a) arg0=3 arg1=4
> test_sdt  ...   666.255692:   sdt_libfoo:table_frob: (4004d7) arg0=2 arg1=4
> test_sdt  ...   666.255694: sdt_libfoo:table_diddle: (40051a) arg0=6 arg1=8
> 

OK, this looks good to me, good job!

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Thanks!

> Signed-off-by: Alexis Berlemont <alexis.berlemont@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c |  83 +++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c          |   6 ++
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h          |   6 ++
>  tools/perf/util/probe-file.c         | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> index c5db14f..09a7f55 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
> +#include <string.h>
> +
>  #include "../../perf.h"
> +#include "../../util/util.h"
>  #include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
>  
>  const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> @@ -26,3 +29,83 @@ const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
>  #endif
>  	SMPL_REG_END
>  };
> +
> +struct sdt_name_reg {
> +	const char *sdt_name;
> +	const char *uprobe_name;
> +};
> +#define SDT_NAME_REG(n, m) {.sdt_name = "%" #n, .uprobe_name = "%" #m}
> +#define SDT_NAME_REG_END {.sdt_name = NULL, .uprobe_name = NULL}
> +
> +static const struct sdt_name_reg sdt_reg_renamings[] = {
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(eax, ax),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rax, ax),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(ebx, bx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rbx, bx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(ecx, cx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rcx, cx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(edx, dx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rdx, dx),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(esi, si),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rsi, si),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(edi, di),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rdi, di),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(ebp, bp),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG(rbp, bp),
> +	SDT_NAME_REG_END,
> +};
> +
> +int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name)
> +{
> +	const struct sdt_name_reg *rnames = sdt_reg_renamings;
> +	char *new_desc, *old_desc = *pdesc;
> +	size_t prefix_len, sdt_len, uprobe_len, old_desc_len, offset;
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	while (ret != 0 && rnames->sdt_name != NULL) {
> +		sdt_len = strlen(rnames->sdt_name);
> +		ret = strncmp(old_name, rnames->sdt_name, sdt_len);
> +		rnames += !!ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (rnames->sdt_name == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	sdt_len = strlen(rnames->sdt_name);
> +	uprobe_len = strlen(rnames->uprobe_name);
> +	old_desc_len = strlen(old_desc) + 1;
> +
> +	new_desc = zalloc(old_desc_len + uprobe_len - sdt_len);
> +	if (new_desc == NULL)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* Copy the chars before the register name (at least '%') */
> +	prefix_len = old_name - old_desc;
> +	memcpy(new_desc, old_desc, prefix_len);
> +
> +	/* Copy the new register name */
> +	memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len, rnames->uprobe_name, uprobe_len);
> +
> +	/* Copy the chars after the register name (if need be) */
> +	offset = prefix_len + sdt_len;
> +	if (offset < old_desc_len) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The orginal register name can be suffixed by 'b',
> +		 * 'w' or 'd' to indicate its size; so, we need to
> +		 * skip this char if we met one.
> +		 */
> +		char sfx = old_desc[offset];
> +
> +		if (sfx == 'b' || sfx == 'w'  || sfx == 'd')
> +			offset++;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (offset < old_desc_len)
> +		memcpy(new_desc + prefix_len + uprobe_len,
> +			old_desc + offset, old_desc_len - offset);
> +
> +	free(old_desc);
> +	*pdesc = new_desc;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> index c4023f2..a37e593 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,12 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
>  	SMPL_REG_END
>  };
>  
> +int __weak sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc __maybe_unused,
> +			char *old_name __maybe_unused)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
>  int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> index 679d6e4..7544a15 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ struct sample_reg {
>  
>  extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
>  
> +/*
> + * The table sdt_reg_renamings is used for adjusting gcc/gas-generated
> + * registers before filling the uprobe tracer interface.
> + */
> +int sdt_rename_register(char **pdesc, char *old_name);
> +
>  #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
>  #include <perf_regs.h>
>  
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> index 436b647..d8a169e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>  #include "probe-event.h"
>  #include "probe-file.h"
>  #include "session.h"
> +#include "perf_regs.h"
>  
>  #define MAX_CMDLEN 256
>  
> @@ -687,6 +688,166 @@ static unsigned long long sdt_note__get_addr(struct sdt_note *note)
>  		 : (unsigned long long)note->addr.a64[0];
>  }
>  
> +static const char * const type_to_suffix[] = {
> +	":s64", "", "", "", ":s32", "", ":s16", ":s8",
> +	"", ":u8", ":u16", "", ":u32", "", "", "", ":u64"
> +};
> +
> +static int synthesize_sdt_probe_arg(struct strbuf *buf, int i, const char *arg)
> +{
> +	char *tmp, *desc = strdup(arg);
> +	const char *prefix = "", *suffix = "";
> +	int ret = -1;
> +
> +	if (desc == NULL) {
> +		pr_debug4("Allocation error\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	tmp = strchr(desc, '@');
> +	if (tmp) {
> +		long type_idx;
> +		/*
> +		 * Isolate the string number and convert it into a
> +		 * binary value; this will be an index to get suffix
> +		 * of the uprobe name (defining the type)
> +		 */
> +		tmp[0] = '\0';
> +		type_idx = strtol(desc, NULL, 10);
> +		/* Check that the conversion went OK */
> +		if (type_idx == LONG_MIN || type_idx == LONG_MAX) {
> +			pr_debug4("Failed to parse sdt type\n");
> +			goto error;
> +		}
> +		/* Check that the converted value is OK */
> +		if (type_idx < -8 || type_idx > 8) {
> +			pr_debug4("Failed to get a valid sdt type\n");
> +			goto error;
> +		}
> +		suffix = type_to_suffix[type_idx + 8];
> +		/* Get rid of the sdt prefix which is now useless */
> +		tmp++;
> +		memmove(desc, tmp, strlen(tmp) + 1);
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The uprobe tracer format does not support all the
> +	 * addressing modes (notably: in x86 the scaled mode); so, we
> +	 * detect ',' characters, if there is just one, there is no
> +	 * use converting the sdt arg into a uprobe one.
> +	 */
> +	if (strchr(desc, ',')) {
> +		pr_debug4("Skipping unsupported SDT argument; %s\n", desc);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the argument addressing mode is indirect, we must check
> +	 * a few things...
> +	 */
> +	tmp = strchr(desc, '(');
> +	if (tmp) {
> +		int j;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * ...if the addressing mode is indirect with a
> +		 * positive offset (ex.: "1608(%ax)"), we need to add
> +		 * a '+' prefix so as to be compliant with uprobe
> +		 * format.
> +		 */
> +		if (desc[0] != '+' && desc[0] != '-')
> +			prefix = "+";
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * ...or if the addressing mode is indirect with a symbol
> +		 * as offset, the argument will not be supported by
> +		 * the uprobe tracer format; so, let's skip this one.
> +		 */
> +		for (j = 0; j < tmp - desc; j++) {
> +			if (desc[j] != '+' && desc[j] != '-' &&
> +				!isdigit(desc[j])) {
> +				pr_debug4("Skipping unsupported SDT argument; "
> +					"%s\n", desc);
> +				goto out;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The uprobe tracer format does not support constants; if we
> +	 * find one in the current argument, let's skip the argument.
> +	 */
> +	if (strchr(desc, '$')) {
> +		pr_debug4("Skipping unsupported SDT argument; %s\n", desc);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The uprobe parser does not support all gas register names;
> +	 * so, we have to replace them (ex. for x86_64: %rax -> %ax);
> +	 * the loop below looks for the register names (starting with
> +	 * a '%' and tries to perform the needed renamings.
> +	 */
> +	tmp = strchr(desc, '%');
> +	while (tmp) {
> +		size_t offset = tmp - desc;
> +
> +		ret = sdt_rename_register(&desc, desc + offset);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto error;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The desc pointer might have changed; so, let's not
> +		 * try to reuse tmp for next lookup
> +		 */
> +		tmp = strchr(desc + offset + 1, '%');
> +	}
> +
> +	if (strbuf_addf(buf, " arg%d=%s%s%s", i + 1, prefix, desc, suffix) < 0)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +out:
> +	ret = 0;
> +error:
> +	free(desc);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static char *synthesize_sdt_probe_command(struct sdt_note *note,
> +					const char *pathname,
> +					const char *sdtgrp)
> +{
> +	struct strbuf buf;
> +	char *ret = NULL, **args;
> +	int i, args_count;
> +
> +	if (strbuf_init(&buf, 32) < 0)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (strbuf_addf(&buf, "p:%s/%s %s:0x%llx",
> +				sdtgrp, note->name, pathname,
> +				sdt_note__get_addr(note)) < 0)
> +		goto error;
> +
> +	if (!note->args)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (note->args) {
> +		args = argv_split(note->args, &args_count);
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < args_count; ++i) {
> +			if (synthesize_sdt_probe_arg(&buf, i, args[i]) < 0)
> +				goto error;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	ret = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> +error:
> +	strbuf_release(&buf);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int probe_cache__scan_sdt(struct probe_cache *pcache, const char *pathname)
>  {
>  	struct probe_cache_entry *entry = NULL;
> @@ -723,11 +884,12 @@ int probe_cache__scan_sdt(struct probe_cache *pcache, const char *pathname)
>  			entry->pev.group = strdup(sdtgrp);
>  			list_add_tail(&entry->node, &pcache->entries);
>  		}
> -		ret = asprintf(&buf, "p:%s/%s %s:0x%llx",
> -				sdtgrp, note->name, pathname,
> -				sdt_note__get_addr(note));
> -		if (ret < 0)
> +		buf = synthesize_sdt_probe_command(note, pathname, sdtgrp);
> +		if (!buf) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
>  			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		strlist__add(entry->tevlist, buf);
>  		free(buf);
>  		entry = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-06 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-16 23:55 [PATCH 0/2] perf: add support of SDT probes arguments Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-16 23:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-16 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-17  9:04   ` Hemant Kumar
2016-11-18 23:56     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-18 23:56     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-25 14:40       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-26  0:58         ` [PATCH v4 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-05 23:42           ` Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-06 14:45             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-26  0:58         ` [PATCH v4 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-07  2:44           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-11-26  0:58         ` [PATCH v4 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-07  3:26           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-12-09 15:14             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-12-10 10:00               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-12-14  0:07             ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-14  7:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-23 11:23                 ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-22 22:41                   ` Alexis Berlemont
2017-01-24  6:58                 ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-01-24  8:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-01-24  8:36                     ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 11:11               ` [PATCH 0/5] perf/sdt: Argument support for x86 and powepc Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 11:11                 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf/sdt: Show proper hint Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 13:40                   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-02 16:20                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-03 10:26                       ` [PATCH v2] " Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-03 15:18                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-07  7:53                           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-07 15:50                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-07  8:00                           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-16 10:16                           ` [RFC] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT event with 'perf record' Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-20  7:08                             ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-20  8:21                               ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-20  8:42                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-02-20 11:01                                   ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-20 14:11                                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-23  8:13                                       ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-23 12:48                                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-02-07  1:13                         ` [PATCH v2] perf/sdt: Show proper hint Masami Hiramatsu
2017-02-10  7:44                         ` [tip:perf/core] perf sdt: Show proper hint when event not yet in place via 'perf probe' tip-bot for Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 11:11                 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf/sdt/x86: Add renaming logic for rNN and other registers Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-07  3:11                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-21 14:08                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-24 18:45                   ` [tip:perf/core] perf sdt x86: " tip-bot for Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 11:11                 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf/sdt/x86: Move OP parser to tools/perf/arch/x86/ Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-07  3:11                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-02-07  5:22                     ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-03-21 14:10                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-21 23:00                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-22 11:22                           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-21 14:55                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-02-02 11:11                 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf/sdt/powerpc: Add argument support Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-02 11:11                 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf/probe: Change MAX_CMDLEN Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-07  1:40                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-02-07  5:45                     ` [PATCH v2] " Ravi Bangoria
2017-03-21  5:19                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-21 13:37                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-24 18:43                       ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: " tip-bot for Ravi Bangoria
2017-02-07  2:55                 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf/sdt: Argument support for x86 and powepc Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-06  7:53                   ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-03-06 13:42                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-21  5:08               ` [PATCH v5 0/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Masami Hiramatsu
2016-12-14  0:07             ` [PATCH v5 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Alexis Berlemont
2017-03-06 13:39               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-03-21 13:52                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-03-24 18:44               ` [tip:perf/core] perf sdt: Add scanning of sdt probes arguments tip-bot for Alexis Berlemont
2016-12-14  0:07             ` [PATCH v5 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont
2017-01-24  8:50               ` Ravi Bangoria
2017-03-06 17:23               ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2017-03-24 18:44               ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Add " tip-bot for Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-18 23:56     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf probe: add " Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-21 10:25       ` Hemant Kumar
2016-11-24 23:13         ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-24 23:13         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] perf sdt: add scanning of sdt probles arguments Alexis Berlemont
2016-11-24 23:13         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] perf probe: add sdt probes arguments into the uprobe cmd string Alexis Berlemont

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170306182300.d66f137aa17f98a100dbbcd9@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexis.berlemont@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).