linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>, Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LW@karo-electronics.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: nand: gpmi: add i.MX 7 SoC support
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 11:17:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170502111758.53e9a959@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+EcR20FCPSec+ihTMA=SGwogd7p5tsnECCp3CR-Nv6fUciK4g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Han,

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:29:16 -0500
Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>  
> >>>>> But then, adding the type would only require 2-3 lines of change if I
> >>>>> add it to the GPMI_IS_MX6 macro...  
> >>>>
> >>>> Then at least add a comment because using type = IMX6SX right under
> >>>> gpmi_data_mx7d can trigger some head-scratching. And put my R-B on V2.  
> >>>
> >>> FWIW, I mentioned it in the commit message.
> >>>
> >>> I think rather then adding a comment it is cleaner to just add IS_IMX7D
> >>> and add it to the GPMI_IS_MX6 macro. That does not need a comment since
> >>> it implicitly says we have a i.MX 7 but treat it like i.MX 6 and it is a
> >>> rather small change. Does that sound acceptable?  
> >>
> >> Sure, that's even better, thanks.
> >>
> >> btw isn't there some single-core mx7 (mx7s ?) , maybe we should just go
> >> with mx7 (without the d suffix). I dunno if it has GPMI NAND though, so
> >> maybe mx7d is the right thing to do here ...
> >>  
> >
> > There is a Solo version yes, and it has GPMI NAND too. However, almost
> > all i.MX 7 IPs have been named imx7d by NXP for some reason (including
> > compatible strings, see grep -r -e imx7 Documentation/), so I thought I
> > stay consistent here...  
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Yes, there should be a i.MX7 Solo version with one core fused out. IMO, can
> we use QUIRK to distinguish them rather than SoC name. I know I also sent
> some patch set with SoC Name but I prefer to use QUIRK now.

Not sure what this means. Are you okay with Stefan's v2?

Regards,

Boris

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-02  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-21  1:07 [PATCH 0/5] mtd: nand: gpmi: add i.MX 7 support Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  1:07 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd: nand: gpmi: unify clock handling Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  2:02   ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-21  1:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: nand: gpmi: add i.MX 7 SoC support Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  2:03   ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-21  3:15     ` Stefan Agner
2017-04-21 13:08       ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-21 16:19         ` Stefan Agner
2017-04-21 17:22           ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-21 17:38             ` Stefan Agner
2017-04-21 18:29               ` Han Xu
2017-05-02  9:17                 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-05-02 11:18                   ` Marek Vasut
2017-05-03 21:24                     ` Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: gpmi: document current clock requirements Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  1:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: imx7: add GPMI NAND Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  1:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: imx7-colibri: add NAND support Stefan Agner
2017-04-21  2:33 ` [PATCH 0/5] mtd: nand: gpmi: add i.MX 7 support Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170502111758.53e9a959@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=LW@karo-electronics.de \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=han.xu@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=xhnjupt@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).