From: Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
pan xinhui <mnipxh@hotmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Adam Wallis <awallis@codeaurora.org>,
Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 18:28:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170505152845.e32h3jxhjdjw6yht@yury-N73SV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170505122639.GB14111@arm.com>
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:26:40PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:53:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 11:28:09PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > I don't think
> > > it's a real use case to have ticket spinlocks and queued rwlocks
> >
> > There's nothing wrong with that combination. In fact, we merged qrwlock
> > much earlier than qspinlock.
>
> ... and that's almost certainly the direction we'll go on arm64 too, not
> least because the former are a lot easier to grok.
>
> Will
Hmm. Then I think I have to split patch 3 to rwlock and spinlock
parts, and allow user to enable them independently in config.
Yury
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 14:51 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks Yury Norov
2017-05-03 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] kernel/locking: #include <asm/spinlock.h> in qrwlock.c Yury Norov
2017-05-03 15:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-03 20:32 ` Yury Norov
2017-05-03 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] asm-generic: don't #include <linux/atomic.h> in qspinlock_types.h Yury Norov
2017-05-04 8:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-05-03 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64/locking: qspinlocks and qrwlocks support Yury Norov
2017-05-09 4:47 ` Boqun Feng
2017-05-09 18:48 ` Yury Norov
2017-05-09 19:37 ` Yury Norov
[not found] ` <SIXPR0199MB0604CF9C101455F7D7417FF7C5160@SIXPR0199MB0604.apcprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
2017-05-04 20:28 ` 答复: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: queued spinlocks and rw-locks Yury Norov
2017-05-05 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-05 12:26 ` Will Deacon
2017-05-05 15:28 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2017-05-05 15:32 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170505152845.e32h3jxhjdjw6yht@yury-N73SV \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=awallis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jglauber@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mnipxh@hotmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).