linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, luca.abeni@santannapisa.it,
	claudio@evidence.eu.com, tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it,
	bristot@redhat.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
	tkjos@android.com, joelaf@google.com, andresoportus@google.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	patrick.bellasi@arm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:01:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170524090136.6bwwsnfy2a6yicbc@e106622-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523190451.3flxegqt7ttmorw6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi,

On 23/05/17 21:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > @@ -157,14 +158,13 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy,
> >  	return cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq(policy, freq);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
> > +static void sugov_get_util(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu)
> >  {
> >  	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> > -	unsigned long dl_util = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 20;
> >  
> > -	*max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
> > -
> > -	*util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg + dl_util, *max);
> > +	sg_cpu->max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
> > +	sg_cpu->util_cfs = rq->cfs.avg.util_avg;
> > +	sg_cpu->util_dl = (rq->dl.running_bw * SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE) >> 20;
> >  }
> 
> Luca just introduced a nice BW_SHIFT for that '20' thing.

Right, will use that.

Thanks,

- Juri

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-24  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-23  8:53 [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make use of DEADLINE utilization signal Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] sched/deadline: move cpu frequency selection triggering points Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 3/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: make worker kthread be SCHED_DEADLINE Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 18:52   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:31     ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 4/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: split utilization signals Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 19:04   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01     ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2017-05-23 19:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 23:30     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-05-24  7:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:01         ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 5/8] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 6/8] sched/sched.h: remove sd arch_scale_freq_capacity parameter Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 7/8] sched/sched.h: move arch_scale_{freq,cpu}_capacity outside CONFIG_SMP Juri Lelli
2017-05-23  8:53 ` [PATCH RFC 8/8] sched/deadline: make bandwidth enforcement scale-invariant Juri Lelli
2017-05-23 20:23 ` [PATCH RFC 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE freq/cpu invariance and OPP selection Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-23 20:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:25   ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24  9:50       ` Juri Lelli
2017-05-24 11:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-24 10:01     ` Luca Abeni
2017-05-24 11:29       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170524090136.6bwwsnfy2a6yicbc@e106622-lin \
    --to=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=andresoportus@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).