* seccomp selftest fails to build with glibc 2.26
@ 2017-09-07 21:27 Seth Forshee
2017-09-07 23:33 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Seth Forshee @ 2017-09-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kees Cook; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Kees,
I'm seeing build failures with your seccomp selftest when using glibc
2.26. The first are related to changing macro names from __have_sig*_t
to __sig*_t_defined. But after defining those there are more conflicting
definitions. I was able to get it to build with the changes below,
however it's ugly so I'm hesitant to suggest that it's a fix (and I
haven't tested with older glibc either).
The full build output is a little lengthy, so I've pasted it at
http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25486192/ rather than including it inline.
Thanks,
Seth
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 03f1fa49..d234a3e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
#define __have_sigval_t 1
#define __have_sigevent_t 1
+/* These fix errors with glibc 2.26 */
+#define __siginfo_t_defined 1
+#define __sigval_t_defined 1
+#define __sigevent_t_defined 1
+#define _BITS_SIGINFO_CONSTS_H 1
+#define _BITS_SIGEVENT_CONSTS_H 1
+
#include <errno.h>
#include <linux/filter.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: seccomp selftest fails to build with glibc 2.26
2017-09-07 21:27 seccomp selftest fails to build with glibc 2.26 Seth Forshee
@ 2017-09-07 23:33 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2017-09-07 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Seth Forshee; +Cc: LKML
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> I'm seeing build failures with your seccomp selftest when using glibc
> 2.26. The first are related to changing macro names from __have_sig*_t
> to __sig*_t_defined. But after defining those there are more conflicting
> definitions. I was able to get it to build with the changes below,
> however it's ugly so I'm hesitant to suggest that it's a fix (and I
> haven't tested with older glibc either).
>
> The full build output is a little lengthy, so I've pasted it at
> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25486192/ rather than including it inline.
Thanks for the details! I took a different route for the solution
(basically, we can drop the hack for glibc not having support for
SIGSYS in its siginfo_t), and sent a separate email with the patch.
-Kees
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
>
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> index 03f1fa49..d234a3e5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@
> #define __have_sigval_t 1
> #define __have_sigevent_t 1
>
> +/* These fix errors with glibc 2.26 */
> +#define __siginfo_t_defined 1
> +#define __sigval_t_defined 1
> +#define __sigevent_t_defined 1
> +#define _BITS_SIGINFO_CONSTS_H 1
> +#define _BITS_SIGEVENT_CONSTS_H 1
> +
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <linux/filter.h>
> #include <sys/prctl.h>
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-07 23:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-07 21:27 seccomp selftest fails to build with glibc 2.26 Seth Forshee
2017-09-07 23:33 ` Kees Cook
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).