[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

[Alex Elder]

This series deletes three config options related to USB on Qualcomm
SoCs from the arm64 "defconfig".  The code enabled by the options is
no longer needed by any Qualcomm hardware.  The driver code that
corresponds to these config options is removed in a separate series.

					-Alex

v2:  Added Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>

Alex Elder (3):
  arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MSM
  arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_MSM_OTG
  arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_QCOM_8X16_PHY

 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MSM

[Alex Elder]

No Qualcomm SoC requires the "ehci-msm.c" code any more.  So remove
the code, and remove the config option from the arm64 defconfig.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 34480e9af2e7..4d0b96bb340a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ CONFIG_USB_OTG=y
 CONFIG_USB_XHCI_HCD=y
 CONFIG_USB_XHCI_TEGRA=y
 CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=y
-CONFIG_USB_EHCI_MSM=y
 CONFIG_USB_EHCI_EXYNOS=y
 CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD_PLATFORM=y
 CONFIG_USB_OHCI_HCD=y
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_MSM_OTG

[Alex Elder]

No Qualcomm SoC requires the "phy-msm-usb.c" USB phy driver support
any more.  Remove the code, and remove the config option from the
arm64 defconfig.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 4d0b96bb340a..85ca53f59c3e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST=y
 CONFIG_USB_ISP1760=y
 CONFIG_USB_HSIC_USB3503=y
 CONFIG_NOP_USB_XCEIV=y
-CONFIG_USB_MSM_OTG=y
 CONFIG_USB_QCOM_8X16_PHY=y
 CONFIG_USB_ULPI=y
 CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
-- 
2.11.0

[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: defconfig: remove CONFIG_USB_QCOM_8X16_PHY

[Alex Elder]

No Qualcomm SoC requires the "phy-qcom-8x16-usb.c" USB phy driver
support any more.  Remove the code, and remove the config option
from the arm64 defconfig.

Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index 85ca53f59c3e..22ca89e58d9d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST=y
 CONFIG_USB_ISP1760=y
 CONFIG_USB_HSIC_USB3503=y
 CONFIG_NOP_USB_XCEIV=y
-CONFIG_USB_QCOM_8X16_PHY=y
 CONFIG_USB_ULPI=y
 CONFIG_USB_GADGET=y
 CONFIG_USB_RENESAS_USBHS_UDC=m
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> wrote:
> This series deletes three config options related to USB on Qualcomm
> SoCs from the arm64 "defconfig".  The code enabled by the options is
> no longer needed by any Qualcomm hardware.  The driver code that
> corresponds to these config options is removed in a separate series.
>
>                                         -Alex
>
> v2:  Added Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>

The patches look good. Should we apply them directly to arm-soc, or is
Andy going to forward them? Normally I'd wait for him to apply them,
but I see he has already given an Ack, so I don't know what to do here.

         Arnd

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

[Alex Elder]

On 11/02/2017 04:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This series deletes three config options related to USB on Qualcomm
>> SoCs from the arm64 "defconfig".  The code enabled by the options is
>> no longer needed by any Qualcomm hardware.  The driver code that
>> corresponds to these config options is removed in a separate series.
>>
>>                                         -Alex
>>
>> v2:  Added Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> 
> The patches look good. Should we apply them directly to arm-soc, or is
> Andy going to forward them? Normally I'd wait for him to apply them,
> but I see he has already given an Ack, so I don't know what to do here.

Andy should answer, but my preference would be for you to apply them
directly.  As long as they have your attention right now you might as
well.  I suppose you could just do that and win the race with Andy...

					-Alex

>          Arnd
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: defconfig: remove some Qualcomm USB options

[Andy Gross]

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 07:47:54AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 04:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org> wrote:
> >> This series deletes three config options related to USB on Qualcomm
> >> SoCs from the arm64 "defconfig".  The code enabled by the options is
> >> no longer needed by any Qualcomm hardware.  The driver code that
> >> corresponds to these config options is removed in a separate series.
> >>
> >>                                         -Alex
> >>
> >> v2:  Added Reviewed-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
> > 
> > The patches look good. Should we apply them directly to arm-soc, or is
> > Andy going to forward them? Normally I'd wait for him to apply them,
> > but I see he has already given an Ack, so I don't know what to do here.
> 
> Andy should answer, but my preference would be for you to apply them
> directly.  As long as they have your attention right now you might as
> well.  I suppose you could just do that and win the race with Andy...

I'll queue them up.  I've been late in getting to these.  Apologies for that.


Andy