linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: x86: dell-smo8800: remove redundant assignments to byte_data
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:41:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171031184123.ssv5yolajiv7u7gj@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Ve852xEsng4cCxznGpkt+P0pnCTX1k9qmVkkZPU3FskOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 31 October 2017 20:08:45 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 16:07:25 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 31 October 2017 15:47:58 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> 
> >> OK, though it doesn't clarify the intention of the byte_data
> >> (useless?) assignments.
> >
> > Probably similar code pattern exists in that lis3lv* driver...
> 
> So, it seems to me OK to apply the patch. No objections?

No objections, you can add my:

Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-31 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-31 11:03 [PATCH] platform: x86: dell-smo8800: remove redundant assignments to byte_data Colin King
2017-10-31 13:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-31 13:55   ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-31 14:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-31 14:13       ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-31 18:08         ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-10-31 18:41           ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-11-03 12:37             ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171031184123.ssv5yolajiv7u7gj@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).