linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through
@ 2017-11-02 18:51 Gustavo A. R. Silva
  2017-11-03  8:04 ` Juergen Gross
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2017-11-02 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boris Ostrovsky, Juergen Gross
  Cc: xen-devel, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
index 0c1ec68..ed94ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c
@@ -1250,7 +1250,8 @@ static void pvcalls_front_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev,
 	case XenbusStateClosed:
 		if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed)
 			break;
-		/* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
+		/* Missed the backend's CLOSING state */
+		/* fall through */
 	case XenbusStateClosing:
 		xenbus_frontend_closed(dev);
 		break;
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through
  2017-11-02 18:51 [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2017-11-03  8:04 ` Juergen Gross
  2017-11-08 21:19   ` Boris Ostrovsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2017-11-03  8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gustavo A. R. Silva, Boris Ostrovsky; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-kernel

On 02/11/17 19:51, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
> on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Juergen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through
  2017-11-03  8:04 ` Juergen Gross
@ 2017-11-08 21:19   ` Boris Ostrovsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Ostrovsky @ 2017-11-08 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross, Gustavo A. R. Silva; +Cc: xen-devel, linux-kernel

On 11/03/2017 04:04 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 02/11/17 19:51, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
>> where we are expecting to fall through.
>>
>> Notice that in this particular case I placed the "fall through" comment
>> on its own line, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Applied to for-linus-4.15.

-boris

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-08 21:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-02 18:51 [PATCH] xen/pvcalls-front: mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-11-03  8:04 ` Juergen Gross
2017-11-08 21:19   ` Boris Ostrovsky

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).