[PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: mark expected switch fall-through

[PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: mark expected switch fall-through

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
"fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
index b9e376c..47fe4c5 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
@@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ static long usb_pcwd_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 			return -EINVAL;
 
 		usb_pcwd_keepalive(usb_pcwd_device);
-		/* Fall */
 	}
+		/* fall through */
 
 	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
 		return put_user(heartbeat, p);
-- 
2.7.4

Re: watchdog: pcwd_usb: mark expected switch fall-through

[Guenter Roeck]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:53:41AM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that in this particular case I replaced "Fall" with a proper
> "fall through" comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
> index b9e376c..47fe4c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/pcwd_usb.c
> @@ -456,8 +456,8 @@ static long usb_pcwd_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>  			return -EINVAL;
>  
>  		usb_pcwd_keepalive(usb_pcwd_device);
> -		/* Fall */
>  	}
> +		/* fall through */
>  
>  	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
>  		return put_user(heartbeat, p);