Re: [GIT PULL] hash addresses printed with %p

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:48:37AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 December 2017 at 09:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:29:28PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >> On 12/04/17 at 08:36am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:02:16AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >> > > +#define __ATTR_IRUSR(_name) {                                            \
> >> > > + .attr   = { .name = __stringify(_name), .mode = S_IRUSR },      \
> >> > > + .show   = _name##_show,                                         \
> >> > > +}
> >> >
> >> > Ick, no, as others, including Linus, have said, using IRUSER is a pain
> >> > in the ass to try to look up and remember what it is...
> >> >
> >> > Just use __ATTR() please, it should be fine for what you need to do,
> >> > which is special-case a sysfs attribute.
> >>
> >> Hmm, I was hesitating to do that because it needs either long code
> >> (over 80 chars) or some driver internal macros.
> >>
> >> There is already same issue in dmi-sysfs.c, it uses an internal macro
> >> DMI_SYSFS_ATTR for 0400 attr.  I did not search all the kernel code,
> >> there might be more for such special cases. Maybe we can add some
> >> comment in sysfs.h to mention this is for some special case?
> >>
> >> I can do something similar as dmi sysfs code though.
> >
> > Hm, let me look at this this afternoon when I get through some stable
> > patches, it shouldn't be that complex to need a whole new macro...
> >
> 
> But wasn't that the whole point? That there is a macro that does what
> you don't want (__ATTR_RO) and none that does what you do want?

my point is that __ATTR() should work for you as-is...