linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	vgoyal@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	davem@davemloft.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au, bhe@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, julien.thierry@arm.com,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/13] kexec_file: make an use of purgatory optional
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 20:33:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180228123359.GB2228@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226102418.GD6019@linaro.org>

On 02/26/18 at 07:24pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:49:34PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi AKASHI,
> > 
> > On 02/22/18 at 08:17pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > On arm64, no trampline code between old kernel and new kernel will be
> > > required in kexec_file implementation. This patch introduces a new
> > > configuration, ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY, and allows related code to be
> > > compiled in only if necessary.
> > 
> > Here also need the explanation about why no purgatory is needed, it would be
> > required for kexec if no strong reason.
> 
> OK, I will add the reason:
> On arm64, crash dump kernel's usable memory is protected by
> *unmapping* it from kernel virtual space unlike other architectures
> where the region is just made read-only.
> So our key developers think that it is highly unlikely that the region
> is accidentally corrupted and this rationalizes that digest check code
> be also dropped from purgatory.
> This greatly simplifies our purgatory without any need for a bit ugly
> relocation stuff, i.e. arch_kexec_apply_relocations_add().
> 
> Please see:
>    http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-December/545428.html
> to find out how simple our purgatory was. All that it does is
> to shuffle arguments and jump into a new kernel.
> 
> Without this patch, we would have to have purgatory with a space for
> a hash value (purgatory_sha256_digest) which is never checked against.
> 
> Do you think it makes sense?

Hmm, it looks reasonable, I remember there could be some performance
issue for a purgatory because of cache disabled for arm64. I do not
object this.

[snip]

Thanks
Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-28 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 11:17 [PATCH v8 00/13] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] resource: add walk_system_ram_res_rev() AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  8:36   ` Dave Young
2018-03-20  1:43     ` Baoquan He
2018-03-20  3:12       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-20  3:48         ` Baoquan He
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] kexec_file: make an use of purgatory optional AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  8:49   ` Dave Young
2018-02-26 10:24     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-28 12:33       ` Dave Young [this message]
2018-03-01  2:59         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file,x86,powerpc: factor out kexec_file_ops functions AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  9:24   ` Dave Young
2018-02-26 10:01     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-26 11:25       ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-28 12:38       ` Dave Young
2018-03-01  3:18         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-26 11:17   ` [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file, x86, powerpc: " Philipp Rudo
2018-02-27  2:03     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27  9:26       ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] x86: kexec_file: factor out elf core header related functions AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-24  3:15   ` Dave Young
2018-02-26  9:21     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] kexec_file, x86: move re-factored code to generic side AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] arm64: kexec_file: invoke the kernel without purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd and device-tree AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] arm64: kexec_file: add Image format support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] arm64: kexec_file: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] arm64: kexec_file: enable KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG for Image AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27  4:56 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-28 12:25   ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180228123359.GB2228@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).