From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Sridhar Pitchai <Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:05:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180315120522.GA15651@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C600E28F-E581-431E-9CD4-47C776E8E70F@microsoft.com>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:03:07AM +0000, Sridhar Pitchai wrote:
> Whenever PCI bus is added, HyperV guarantees the BUS id is unique. Even
"Whenever a PCI bus is added"
> with that when a first device is added to the bus, it overrides bus domain
> ID with the device serial number. Sometime this can result in BUS ID not
Define "Sometime".
> being unique. In this case, when PCI_BUS and a device to bus is added, the
> first device overwrites the bus domain ID to the device serial number,
> which is 0. Since there exsist a PCI bus with domain ID 0 already the PCI
s/exsist/exist
> bus addition fails. This patch make sure when a device is added to a bus,
> it never updated the bus domain ID.
s/updated/updates
> Since we have the transparent SRIOV mode now, the short VF device name
> is no longer needed.
I still do not understand what this means and how it is related to the
patch below, it may be clear to you, it is not to me, at all.
> Fixes: 4a9b0933bdfc("PCI:hv:Use device serial number as PCI domain")
Fixes: 4a9b0933bdfc ("PCI: hv: Use device serial number as PCI domain")
I asked you an explicit question. Commit above was added for a reason
I assume. This patch implies that kernel has been broken since v4.11
which is almost a year ago and nobody every noticed ? Or there are
systems where commit above is _necessary_ and this patch would break
them ?
I want a detailed explanation that highlights *why* it is safe to apply
this patch and send it to stable kernels, commit log above won't do.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Pitchai <srpitcha@microsoft.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> * fix the commit comment. [KY Srinivasan, Michael Kelley]
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 11 -----------
> 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 2faf38e..ac67e56 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -1518,17 +1518,6 @@ static struct hv_pci_dev *new_pcichild_device(struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
> get_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_childlist);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
>
> - /*
> - * When a device is being added to the bus, we set the PCI domain
> - * number to be the device serial number, which is non-zero and
> - * unique on the same VM. The serial numbers start with 1, and
> - * increase by 1 for each device. So device names including this
> - * can have shorter names than based on the bus instance UUID.
> - * Only the first device serial number is used for domain, so the
> - * domain number will not change after the first device is added.
> - */
> - if (list_empty(&hbus->children))
> - hbus->sysdata.domain = desc->ser;
> list_add_tail(&hpdev->list_entry, &hbus->children);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
> return hpdev;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 0:03 [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 12:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2018-03-15 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 18:24 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 17:56 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 18:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-20 23:00 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-23 16:41 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-23 16:47 ` Greg KH
2018-03-26 17:32 ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 17:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-23 16:09 ` Sridhar Pitchai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180315120522.GA15651@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).