linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sridhar Pitchai <Sridhar.Pitchai@microsoft.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
	Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:41:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A0639B-3C54-456D-95C1-829332C024EE@microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180321162555.GA16028@red-moon>

    Please read the link I sent you in relation to email formatting.
    
    Then add your description above in a way that anyone not 100% familiar
    with hyperv can understand it - that's what the commit log is for.
    
    You are sending this patch to stable kernels, patch above has been in
    the kernel from v4.14. The patch you are fixing since v4.11, you ought
    to be careful since you do not want to have broken kernel versions owing
    to stable patches mismatches, that's why I asked and I will ask again,
    are you sure you won't trigger a regression by sending this fix to
    stable ?
    
    I assume the bond driver mechanism is now done and dusted.
    
That is correct. I have sent a v4 version of the patch. I am sending this
patch for stable kernel. We have tested and I am sure this should not trigger
regression by sending this fix to stable.

Thanks
Sridhar Pitchai     
 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-23 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-15  0:03 [PATCH v3]PCI: hv: fix PCI-BUS domainID corruption Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 12:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-15 17:56   ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-15 18:24     ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 17:56       ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-20 18:32         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-20 23:00           ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 16:26             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-23 16:41               ` Sridhar Pitchai [this message]
2018-03-23 16:47                 ` Greg KH
2018-03-26 17:32                   ` Sridhar Pitchai
2018-03-21 17:30             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-23 16:09               ` Sridhar Pitchai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A0639B-3C54-456D-95C1-829332C024EE@microsoft.com \
    --to=sridhar.pitchai@microsoft.com \
    --cc=Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).