* [PATCH v3 0/3] restructure memfd code
@ 2018-04-09 23:05 Mike Kravetz
2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry Mike Kravetz
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm, linux-kernel
Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko,
Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz,
Andrew Morton, Mike Kravetz
This is a replacement for "Patch series restructure memfd code, v2"
which is currently in mmotm and consists of:
- mm: hugetlbfs: move HUGETLBFS_I outside #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS
- mm: memfd: split out memfd for use by multiple filesystems
- mm: memfd: remove memfd code from shmem files and use new memfd files
The above series incorrectly moves the memfd code out of shemm.c as
a separate commit. Please let me know if there are any issues with
the way code is restructured/moved in this series. Specifically,
the last patch.
While redoing the series, all sparse warnings in mm/shmem.c are fixed
in patch 1. Patch 2 updates comments and file checking such that patch
3 is only code movement.
Mike Kravetz (3):
mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry
mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking
mm: restructure memfd code
fs/Kconfig | 3 +
fs/fcntl.c | 2 +-
include/linux/memfd.h | 16 +++
include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 13 --
mm/Makefile | 1 +
mm/memfd.c | 344 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/shmem.c | 338 ++--------------------------------------------
7 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 341 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/linux/memfd.h
create mode 100644 mm/memfd.c
--
2.13.6
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry 2018-04-09 23:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton, Mike Kravetz In preparation for memfd code restucture, clean up sparse warnings. Most changes required adding __rcu annotations. The routine find_swap_entry was modified to properly deference radix tree entries. Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> --- mm/shmem.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index b85919243399..c7bad16fe884 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int shmem_radix_tree_replace(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, void *expected, void *replacement) { struct radix_tree_node *node; - void **pslot; + void __rcu **pslot; void *item; VM_BUG_ON(!expected); @@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ static bool shmem_confirm_swap(struct address_space *mapping, #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGE_PAGECACHE /* ifdef here to avoid bloating shmem.o when not necessary */ -int shmem_huge __read_mostly; +static int shmem_huge __read_mostly; #if defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) || defined(CONFIG_TMPFS) static int shmem_parse_huge(const char *str) @@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ unsigned long shmem_partial_swap_usage(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void **slot; + void __rcu **slot; struct page *page; unsigned long swapped = 0; @@ -1098,13 +1098,19 @@ static void shmem_evict_inode(struct inode *inode) static unsigned long find_swap_entry(struct radix_tree_root *root, void *item) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void **slot; + void __rcu **slot; unsigned long found = -1; unsigned int checked = 0; rcu_read_lock(); radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, root, &iter, 0) { - if (*slot == item) { + void *entry = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(entry)) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); + continue; + } + if (entry == item) { found = iter.index; break; } @@ -2623,7 +2629,7 @@ static loff_t shmem_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void **slot; + void __rcu **slot; pgoff_t start; struct page *page; @@ -2665,7 +2671,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void **slot; + void __rcu **slot; pgoff_t start; struct page *page; int error, scan; -- 2.13.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking 2018-04-09 23:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 16:54 ` Khalid Aziz 2018-04-10 23:51 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton, Mike Kravetz In preparation for memfd code restucture, update comments dealing with file sealing to indicate that tmpfs and hugetlbfs are the supported filesystems. Also, change file pointer checks in memfd_file_seals_ptr to use defined routines instead of directly referencing file_operation structs. Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> --- mm/shmem.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index c7bad16fe884..be20fc388dcb 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2734,11 +2734,11 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) { - if (file->f_op == &shmem_file_operations) + if (shmem_file(file)) return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS - if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations) + if (is_file_hugepages(file)) return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; #endif @@ -2758,16 +2758,17 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) /* * SEALING - * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a shmem-file but restrict - * access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals can only be - * added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted parties can - * share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. A malicious - * peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a shared object. + * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file + * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals + * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted + * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. + * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a + * shared object. * - * Seals are only supported on special shmem-files and always affect - * the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it may prevent some - * kinds of access to the file. Currently, the following seals are - * defined: + * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and + * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it + * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the + * following seals are defined: * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing @@ -2781,9 +2782,9 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) * added. * * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only - * anonymous shmem files support sealing. More importantly, seals are - * never written to disk. Therefore, there's no plan to support it on - * other file types. + * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More + * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's + * no plan to support it on other file types. */ if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) -- 2.13.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 16:54 ` Khalid Aziz 2018-04-10 23:51 ` Mike Kravetz 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Khalid Aziz @ 2018-04-10 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Kravetz, linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Andrew Morton On 04/09/2018 05:05 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > In preparation for memfd code restucture, update comments dealing > with file sealing to indicate that tmpfs and hugetlbfs are the > supported filesystems. Also, change file pointer checks in > memfd_file_seals_ptr to use defined routines instead of directly > referencing file_operation structs. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> > --- > mm/shmem.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 16:54 ` Khalid Aziz @ 2018-04-10 23:51 ` Mike Kravetz 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton In response to Matthew's question about patch 3, I went back and cleaned up all comments, definitions and function names that will be moved to the new memfd files. No functional changes from previous version. This will require a new version of patch 3. >From f9f98e0d6fd87af4b48befbad757467f834a868c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:04:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking In preparation for memfd code restructure, update comments, definitions and function names dealing with file sealing to indicate that tmpfs and hugetlbfs are the supported filesystems. Also, change file pointer checks in memfd_file_seals_ptr to use defined interfaces instead of directly referencing file_operation structs. Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> --- mm/shmem.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index c7bad16fe884..a8bff40a10cd 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2621,12 +2621,13 @@ static loff_t shmem_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) /* * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, - * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on tmpfs + * or hugetlbfs because they are memory only filesystems. */ -#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE +#define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE #define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ -static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; void __rcu **slot; @@ -2647,7 +2648,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) { spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, iter.index, - SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); + MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); } @@ -2668,7 +2669,7 @@ static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references * to those pages to avoid races. */ -static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) { struct radix_tree_iter iter; void __rcu **slot; @@ -2676,11 +2677,11 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) struct page *page; int error, scan; - shmem_tag_pins(mapping); + memfd_tag_pins(mapping); error = 0; for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { - if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED)) + if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED)) break; if (!scan) @@ -2691,7 +2692,7 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) start = 0; rcu_read_lock(); radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, - start, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED) { + start, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) { page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); if (radix_tree_exception(page)) { @@ -2718,7 +2719,7 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree, - iter.index, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); + iter.index, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); continue_resched: if (need_resched()) { @@ -2734,11 +2735,11 @@ static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) { - if (file->f_op == &shmem_file_operations) + if (shmem_file(file)) return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS - if (file->f_op == &hugetlbfs_file_operations) + if (is_file_hugepages(file)) return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; #endif @@ -2758,16 +2759,17 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) /* * SEALING - * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a shmem-file but restrict - * access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals can only be - * added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted parties can - * share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. A malicious - * peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a shared object. + * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file + * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals + * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted + * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. + * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a + * shared object. * - * Seals are only supported on special shmem-files and always affect - * the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it may prevent some - * kinds of access to the file. Currently, the following seals are - * defined: + * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and + * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it + * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the + * following seals are defined: * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing @@ -2781,9 +2783,9 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) * added. * * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only - * anonymous shmem files support sealing. More importantly, seals are - * never written to disk. Therefore, there's no plan to support it on - * other file types. + * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More + * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's + * no plan to support it on other file types. */ if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) @@ -2809,7 +2811,7 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) if (error) goto unlock; - error = shmem_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); + error = memfd_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); if (error) { mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping); goto unlock; -- 2.13.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code 2018-04-09 23:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 1:41 ` Matthew Wilcox 2018-04-10 16:55 ` Khalid Aziz 2 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-09 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton, Mike Kravetz With the addition of memfd hugetlbfs support, we now have the situation where memfd depends on TMPFS -or- HUGETLBFS. Previously, memfd was only supported on tmpfs, so it made sense that the code resided in shmem.c. In the current code, memfd is only functional if TMPFS is defined. If HUGETLFS is defined and TMPFS is not defined, then memfd functionality will not be available for hugetlbfs. This does not cause BUGs, just a lack of potentially desired functionality. Code is restructured in the following way: - include/linux/memfd.h is a new file containing memfd specific definitions previously contained in shmem_fs.h. - mm/memfd.c is a new file containing memfd specific code previously contained in shmem.c. - memfd specific code is removed from shmem_fs.h and shmem.c. - A new config option MEMFD_CREATE is added that is defined if TMPFS or HUGETLBFS is defined. No functional changes are made to the code: restructuring only. Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> --- fs/Kconfig | 3 + fs/fcntl.c | 2 +- include/linux/memfd.h | 16 +++ include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 13 -- mm/Makefile | 1 + mm/memfd.c | 344 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/shmem.c | 323 -------------------------------------------- 7 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 337 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/memfd.h create mode 100644 mm/memfd.c diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index bc821a86d965..8b344110b2cd 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ config HUGETLBFS config HUGETLB_PAGE def_bool HUGETLBFS +config MEMFD_CREATE + def_bool TMPFS || HUGETLBFS + config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE bool diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c index 1e97f1fda90c..df113f65a2a1 100644 --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #include <linux/user_namespace.h> -#include <linux/shmem_fs.h> +#include <linux/memfd.h> #include <linux/compat.h> #include <linux/poll.h> diff --git a/include/linux/memfd.h b/include/linux/memfd.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4f1600413f91 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/memfd.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __LINUX_MEMFD_H +#define __LINUX_MEMFD_H + +#include <linux/file.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE +extern long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); +#else +static inline long memfd_fcntl(struct file *f, unsigned int c, unsigned long a) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} +#endif + +#endif /* __LINUX_MEMFD_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h index 73b5e655a76e..f155dc607112 100644 --- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h +++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h @@ -110,19 +110,6 @@ static inline bool shmem_file(struct file *file) extern bool shmem_charge(struct inode *inode, long pages); extern void shmem_uncharge(struct inode *inode, long pages); -#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS - -extern long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); - -#else - -static inline long memfd_fcntl(struct file *f, unsigned int c, unsigned long a) -{ - return -EINVAL; -} - -#endif - #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGE_PAGECACHE extern bool shmem_huge_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma); #else diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile index e669f02c5a54..1e0edbc59211 100644 --- a/mm/Makefile +++ b/mm/Makefile @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_REF) += debug_page_ref.o obj-$(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY) += usercopy.o obj-$(CONFIG_PERCPU_STATS) += percpu-stats.o obj-$(CONFIG_HMM) += hmm.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) += memfd.o diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..001c55e3b413 --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -0,0 +1,344 @@ +/* + * memfd_create system call and file sealing support + * + * Code was originally included in shmem.c, and broken out to facilitate + * use by hugetlbfs as well as tmpfs. + * + * This file is released under the GPL. + */ + +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/vfs.h> +#include <linux/pagemap.h> +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h> +#include <linux/khugepaged.h> +#include <linux/syscalls.h> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h> +#include <linux/shmem_fs.h> +#include <linux/memfd.h> +#include <uapi/linux/memfd.h> + +/* + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. + */ +#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE +#define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ + +static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void __rcu **slot; + pgoff_t start; + struct page *page; + + lru_add_drain(); + start = 0; + rcu_read_lock(); + + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { + page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); + continue; + } + } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) { + spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, iter.index, + SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + } + + if (need_resched()) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); + cond_resched_rcu(); + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +/* + * Setting SEAL_WRITE requires us to verify there's no pending writer. However, + * via get_user_pages(), drivers might have some pending I/O without any active + * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all pages + * and see whether it has an elevated ref-count. If so, we tag them and wait for + * them to be dropped. + * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references + * to those pages to avoid races. + */ +static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void __rcu **slot; + pgoff_t start; + struct page *page; + int error, scan; + + shmem_tag_pins(mapping); + + error = 0; + for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { + if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED)) + break; + + if (!scan) + lru_add_drain_all(); + else if (schedule_timeout_killable((HZ << scan) / 200)) + scan = LAST_SCAN; + + start = 0; + rcu_read_lock(); + radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, + start, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED) { + + page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + if (radix_tree_exception(page)) { + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); + continue; + } + + page = NULL; + } + + if (page && + page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) != 1) { + if (scan < LAST_SCAN) + goto continue_resched; + + /* + * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags + * we inserted; but make a note that we still + * found pages pinned. + */ + error = -EBUSY; + } + + spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree, + iter.index, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); +continue_resched: + if (need_resched()) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); + cond_resched_rcu(); + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + } + + return error; +} + +static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) +{ + if (shmem_file(file)) + return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; + +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS + if (is_file_hugepages(file)) + return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; +#endif + + return NULL; +} + +#define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \ + F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ + F_SEAL_GROW | \ + F_SEAL_WRITE) + +static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) +{ + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); + unsigned int *file_seals; + int error; + + /* + * SEALING + * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file + * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals + * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted + * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. + * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a + * shared object. + * + * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and + * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it + * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the + * following seals are defined: + * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file + * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking + * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing + * SEAL_WRITE: Prevent write access to the file + * + * As we don't require any trust relationship between two parties, we + * must prevent seals from being removed. Therefore, sealing a file + * only adds a given set of seals to the file, it never touches + * existing seals. Furthermore, the "setting seals"-operation can be + * sealed itself, which basically prevents any further seal from being + * added. + * + * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only + * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More + * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's + * no plan to support it on other file types. + */ + + if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) + return -EPERM; + if (seals & ~(unsigned int)F_ALL_SEALS) + return -EINVAL; + + inode_lock(inode); + + file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + if (!file_seals) { + error = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + + if (*file_seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) { + error = -EPERM; + goto unlock; + } + + if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) { + error = mapping_deny_writable(file->f_mapping); + if (error) + goto unlock; + + error = shmem_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); + if (error) { + mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping); + goto unlock; + } + } + + *file_seals |= seals; + error = 0; + +unlock: + inode_unlock(inode); + return error; +} + +static int memfd_get_seals(struct file *file) +{ + unsigned int *seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + + return seals ? *seals : -EINVAL; +} + +long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +{ + long error; + + switch (cmd) { + case F_ADD_SEALS: + /* disallow upper 32bit */ + if (arg > UINT_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + + error = memfd_add_seals(file, arg); + break; + case F_GET_SEALS: + error = memfd_get_seals(file); + break; + default: + error = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + return error; +} + +#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX "memfd:" +#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(MFD_NAME_PREFIX) - 1) +#define MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN (NAME_MAX - MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) + +#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB) + +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, + const char __user *, uname, + unsigned int, flags) +{ + unsigned int *file_seals; + struct file *file; + int fd, error; + char *name; + long len; + + if (!(flags & MFD_HUGETLB)) { + if (flags & ~(unsigned int)MFD_ALL_FLAGS) + return -EINVAL; + } else { + /* Allow huge page size encoding in flags. */ + if (flags & ~(unsigned int)(MFD_ALL_FLAGS | + (MFD_HUGE_MASK << MFD_HUGE_SHIFT))) + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* length includes terminating zero */ + len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); + if (len <= 0) + return -EFAULT; + if (len > MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1) + return -EINVAL; + + name = kmalloc(len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + + strcpy(name, MFD_NAME_PREFIX); + if (copy_from_user(&name[MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN], uname, len)) { + error = -EFAULT; + goto err_name; + } + + /* terminating-zero may have changed after strnlen_user() returned */ + if (name[len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN - 1]) { + error = -EFAULT; + goto err_name; + } + + fd = get_unused_fd_flags((flags & MFD_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0); + if (fd < 0) { + error = fd; + goto err_name; + } + + if (flags & MFD_HUGETLB) { + struct user_struct *user = NULL; + + file = hugetlb_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE, &user, + HUGETLB_ANONHUGE_INODE, + (flags >> MFD_HUGE_SHIFT) & + MFD_HUGE_MASK); + } else + file = shmem_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE); + if (IS_ERR(file)) { + error = PTR_ERR(file); + goto err_fd; + } + file->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; + file->f_flags |= O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE; + + if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { + file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; + } + + fd_install(fd, file); + kfree(name); + return fd; + +err_fd: + put_unused_fd(fd); +err_name: + kfree(name); + return error; +} diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index be20fc388dcb..9da9d0001069 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2619,242 +2619,6 @@ static loff_t shmem_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return offset; } -/* - * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, - * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. - */ -#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE -#define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ - -static void shmem_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) -{ - struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void __rcu **slot; - pgoff_t start; - struct page *page; - - lru_add_drain(); - start = 0; - rcu_read_lock(); - - radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); - if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { - if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); - continue; - } - } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) { - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, iter.index, - SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); - spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - } - - if (need_resched()) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); - cond_resched_rcu(); - } - } - rcu_read_unlock(); -} - -/* - * Setting SEAL_WRITE requires us to verify there's no pending writer. However, - * via get_user_pages(), drivers might have some pending I/O without any active - * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all pages - * and see whether it has an elevated ref-count. If so, we tag them and wait for - * them to be dropped. - * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references - * to those pages to avoid races. - */ -static int shmem_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) -{ - struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void __rcu **slot; - pgoff_t start; - struct page *page; - int error, scan; - - shmem_tag_pins(mapping); - - error = 0; - for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { - if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED)) - break; - - if (!scan) - lru_add_drain_all(); - else if (schedule_timeout_killable((HZ << scan) / 200)) - scan = LAST_SCAN; - - start = 0; - rcu_read_lock(); - radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, - start, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED) { - - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); - if (radix_tree_exception(page)) { - if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); - continue; - } - - page = NULL; - } - - if (page && - page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) != 1) { - if (scan < LAST_SCAN) - goto continue_resched; - - /* - * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags - * we inserted; but make a note that we still - * found pages pinned. - */ - error = -EBUSY; - } - - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree, - iter.index, SHMEM_TAG_PINNED); - spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); -continue_resched: - if (need_resched()) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); - cond_resched_rcu(); - } - } - rcu_read_unlock(); - } - - return error; -} - -static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) -{ - if (shmem_file(file)) - return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; - -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS - if (is_file_hugepages(file)) - return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; -#endif - - return NULL; -} - -#define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \ - F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ - F_SEAL_GROW | \ - F_SEAL_WRITE) - -static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) -{ - struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); - unsigned int *file_seals; - int error; - - /* - * SEALING - * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file - * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals - * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted - * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. - * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a - * shared object. - * - * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and - * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it - * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the - * following seals are defined: - * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file - * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking - * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing - * SEAL_WRITE: Prevent write access to the file - * - * As we don't require any trust relationship between two parties, we - * must prevent seals from being removed. Therefore, sealing a file - * only adds a given set of seals to the file, it never touches - * existing seals. Furthermore, the "setting seals"-operation can be - * sealed itself, which basically prevents any further seal from being - * added. - * - * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only - * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More - * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's - * no plan to support it on other file types. - */ - - if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) - return -EPERM; - if (seals & ~(unsigned int)F_ALL_SEALS) - return -EINVAL; - - inode_lock(inode); - - file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - if (!file_seals) { - error = -EINVAL; - goto unlock; - } - - if (*file_seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) { - error = -EPERM; - goto unlock; - } - - if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) { - error = mapping_deny_writable(file->f_mapping); - if (error) - goto unlock; - - error = shmem_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); - if (error) { - mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping); - goto unlock; - } - } - - *file_seals |= seals; - error = 0; - -unlock: - inode_unlock(inode); - return error; -} - -static int memfd_get_seals(struct file *file) -{ - unsigned int *seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - - return seals ? *seals : -EINVAL; -} - -long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) -{ - long error; - - switch (cmd) { - case F_ADD_SEALS: - /* disallow upper 32bit */ - if (arg > UINT_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - - error = memfd_add_seals(file, arg); - break; - case F_GET_SEALS: - error = memfd_get_seals(file); - break; - default: - error = -EINVAL; - break; - } - - return error; -} - static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) { @@ -3677,93 +3441,6 @@ static int shmem_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) return 0; } -#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX "memfd:" -#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(MFD_NAME_PREFIX) - 1) -#define MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN (NAME_MAX - MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) - -#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB) - -SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, - const char __user *, uname, - unsigned int, flags) -{ - unsigned int *file_seals; - struct file *file; - int fd, error; - char *name; - long len; - - if (!(flags & MFD_HUGETLB)) { - if (flags & ~(unsigned int)MFD_ALL_FLAGS) - return -EINVAL; - } else { - /* Allow huge page size encoding in flags. */ - if (flags & ~(unsigned int)(MFD_ALL_FLAGS | - (MFD_HUGE_MASK << MFD_HUGE_SHIFT))) - return -EINVAL; - } - - /* length includes terminating zero */ - len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); - if (len <= 0) - return -EFAULT; - if (len > MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1) - return -EINVAL; - - name = kmalloc(len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!name) - return -ENOMEM; - - strcpy(name, MFD_NAME_PREFIX); - if (copy_from_user(&name[MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN], uname, len)) { - error = -EFAULT; - goto err_name; - } - - /* terminating-zero may have changed after strnlen_user() returned */ - if (name[len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN - 1]) { - error = -EFAULT; - goto err_name; - } - - fd = get_unused_fd_flags((flags & MFD_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0); - if (fd < 0) { - error = fd; - goto err_name; - } - - if (flags & MFD_HUGETLB) { - struct user_struct *user = NULL; - - file = hugetlb_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE, &user, - HUGETLB_ANONHUGE_INODE, - (flags >> MFD_HUGE_SHIFT) & - MFD_HUGE_MASK); - } else - file = shmem_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE); - if (IS_ERR(file)) { - error = PTR_ERR(file); - goto err_fd; - } - file->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; - file->f_flags |= O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE; - - if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { - file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; - } - - fd_install(fd, file); - kfree(name); - return fd; - -err_fd: - put_unused_fd(fd); -err_name: - kfree(name); - return error; -} - #endif /* CONFIG_TMPFS */ static void shmem_put_super(struct super_block *sb) -- 2.13.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 1:41 ` Matthew Wilcox 2018-04-10 3:03 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 16:55 ` Khalid Aziz 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-04-10 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:05:05PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: > +/* > + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, > + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. > + */ > +#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE Do we also firmly believe it's never used on hugetlbfs? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code 2018-04-10 1:41 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-04-10 3:03 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 23:55 ` Mike Kravetz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton On 04/09/2018 06:41 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:05:05PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> +/* >> + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, >> + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. >> + */ >> +#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE > > Do we also firmly believe it's never used on hugetlbfs? > Yes. hugetlbfs is memory resident only with no writeback. This comment and name should have been updated when hugetlbfs support was added. Also, ideally all the memfd related function names of the form shmem_* should have been changed to memfd_* when hugetlbfs support was added. Some of them were changed, but not all. I can clean all this up. But, I would want to do it in patch 2 of the series. That is where other cleanup such as this was done before code movement. Will wait a little while for any additional comments before sending series again. -- Mike Kravetz ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code 2018-04-10 3:03 ` Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 23:55 ` Mike Kravetz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Mike Kravetz @ 2018-04-10 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Khalid Aziz, Andrew Morton On 04/09/2018 08:03 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 04/09/2018 06:41 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:05:05PM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote: >>> +/* >>> + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, >>> + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on shmem. >>> + */ >>> +#define SHMEM_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE >> >> Do we also firmly believe it's never used on hugetlbfs? >> > > Yes. hugetlbfs is memory resident only with no writeback. > This comment and name should have been updated when hugetlbfs support was > added. > > Also, ideally all the memfd related function names of the form shmem_* should > have been changed to memfd_* when hugetlbfs support was added. Some of them > were changed, but not all. > > I can clean all this up. But, I would want to do it in patch 2 of the series. > That is where other cleanup such as this was done before code movement. > > Will wait a little while for any additional comments before sending series > again. Cleanups were made in an updated patch 2. This update is simply based on the new cleanups made in patch 2. No functional changes from previous version. >From d31b78da2a0cf1b80588a7aa84324bb572d2e082 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:57:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code With the addition of memfd hugetlbfs support, we now have the situation where memfd depends on TMPFS -or- HUGETLBFS. Previously, memfd was only supported on tmpfs, so it made sense that the code resided in shmem.c. In the current code, memfd is only functional if TMPFS is defined. If HUGETLFS is defined and TMPFS is not defined, then memfd functionality will not be available for hugetlbfs. This does not cause BUGs, just a lack of potentially desired functionality. Code is restructured in the following way: - include/linux/memfd.h is a new file containing memfd specific definitions previously contained in shmem_fs.h. - mm/memfd.c is a new file containing memfd specific code previously contained in shmem.c. - memfd specific code is removed from shmem_fs.h and shmem.c. - A new config option MEMFD_CREATE is added that is defined if TMPFS or HUGETLBFS is defined. No functional changes are made to the code: restructuring only. Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> --- fs/Kconfig | 3 + fs/fcntl.c | 2 +- include/linux/memfd.h | 16 +++ include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 13 -- mm/Makefile | 1 + mm/memfd.c | 345 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mm/shmem.c | 324 -------------------------------------------- 7 files changed, 366 insertions(+), 338 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/memfd.h create mode 100644 mm/memfd.c diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index bc821a86d965..8b344110b2cd 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -203,6 +203,9 @@ config HUGETLBFS config HUGETLB_PAGE def_bool HUGETLBFS +config MEMFD_CREATE + def_bool TMPFS || HUGETLBFS + config ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE bool diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c index 1e97f1fda90c..df113f65a2a1 100644 --- a/fs/fcntl.c +++ b/fs/fcntl.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ #include <linux/rcupdate.h> #include <linux/pid_namespace.h> #include <linux/user_namespace.h> -#include <linux/shmem_fs.h> +#include <linux/memfd.h> #include <linux/compat.h> #include <linux/poll.h> diff --git a/include/linux/memfd.h b/include/linux/memfd.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4f1600413f91 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/memfd.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef __LINUX_MEMFD_H +#define __LINUX_MEMFD_H + +#include <linux/file.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE +extern long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); +#else +static inline long memfd_fcntl(struct file *f, unsigned int c, unsigned long a) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} +#endif + +#endif /* __LINUX_MEMFD_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h index 73b5e655a76e..f155dc607112 100644 --- a/include/linux/shmem_fs.h +++ b/include/linux/shmem_fs.h @@ -110,19 +110,6 @@ static inline bool shmem_file(struct file *file) extern bool shmem_charge(struct inode *inode, long pages); extern void shmem_uncharge(struct inode *inode, long pages); -#ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS - -extern long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg); - -#else - -static inline long memfd_fcntl(struct file *f, unsigned int c, unsigned long a) -{ - return -EINVAL; -} - -#endif - #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGE_PAGECACHE extern bool shmem_huge_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma); #else diff --git a/mm/Makefile b/mm/Makefile index e669f02c5a54..1e0edbc59211 100644 --- a/mm/Makefile +++ b/mm/Makefile @@ -105,3 +105,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_REF) += debug_page_ref.o obj-$(CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY) += usercopy.o obj-$(CONFIG_PERCPU_STATS) += percpu-stats.o obj-$(CONFIG_HMM) += hmm.o +obj-$(CONFIG_MEMFD_CREATE) += memfd.o diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..8969e7ed279e --- /dev/null +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ +/* + * memfd_create system call and file sealing support + * + * Code was originally included in shmem.c, and broken out to facilitate + * use by hugetlbfs as well as tmpfs. + * + * This file is released under the GPL. + */ + +#include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/vfs.h> +#include <linux/pagemap.h> +#include <linux/file.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/sched/signal.h> +#include <linux/khugepaged.h> +#include <linux/syscalls.h> +#include <linux/hugetlb.h> +#include <linux/shmem_fs.h> +#include <linux/memfd.h> +#include <uapi/linux/memfd.h> + +/* + * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, + * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on tmpfs + * or hugetlbfs because they are memory only filesystems. + */ +#define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE +#define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ + +static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void __rcu **slot; + pgoff_t start; + struct page *page; + + lru_add_drain(); + start = 0; + rcu_read_lock(); + + radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { + page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); + continue; + } + } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) { + spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, iter.index, + MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + } + + if (need_resched()) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); + cond_resched_rcu(); + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); +} + +/* + * Setting SEAL_WRITE requires us to verify there's no pending writer. However, + * via get_user_pages(), drivers might have some pending I/O without any active + * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all pages + * and see whether it has an elevated ref-count. If so, we tag them and wait for + * them to be dropped. + * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references + * to those pages to avoid races. + */ +static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + struct radix_tree_iter iter; + void __rcu **slot; + pgoff_t start; + struct page *page; + int error, scan; + + memfd_tag_pins(mapping); + + error = 0; + for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { + if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED)) + break; + + if (!scan) + lru_add_drain_all(); + else if (schedule_timeout_killable((HZ << scan) / 200)) + scan = LAST_SCAN; + + start = 0; + rcu_read_lock(); + radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, + start, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) { + + page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); + if (radix_tree_exception(page)) { + if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); + continue; + } + + page = NULL; + } + + if (page && + page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) != 1) { + if (scan < LAST_SCAN) + goto continue_resched; + + /* + * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags + * we inserted; but make a note that we still + * found pages pinned. + */ + error = -EBUSY; + } + + spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); + radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree, + iter.index, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); +continue_resched: + if (need_resched()) { + slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); + cond_resched_rcu(); + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + } + + return error; +} + +static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) +{ + if (shmem_file(file)) + return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; + +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS + if (is_file_hugepages(file)) + return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; +#endif + + return NULL; +} + +#define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \ + F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ + F_SEAL_GROW | \ + F_SEAL_WRITE) + +static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) +{ + struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); + unsigned int *file_seals; + int error; + + /* + * SEALING + * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file + * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals + * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted + * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. + * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a + * shared object. + * + * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and + * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it + * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the + * following seals are defined: + * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file + * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking + * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing + * SEAL_WRITE: Prevent write access to the file + * + * As we don't require any trust relationship between two parties, we + * must prevent seals from being removed. Therefore, sealing a file + * only adds a given set of seals to the file, it never touches + * existing seals. Furthermore, the "setting seals"-operation can be + * sealed itself, which basically prevents any further seal from being + * added. + * + * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only + * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More + * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's + * no plan to support it on other file types. + */ + + if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) + return -EPERM; + if (seals & ~(unsigned int)F_ALL_SEALS) + return -EINVAL; + + inode_lock(inode); + + file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + if (!file_seals) { + error = -EINVAL; + goto unlock; + } + + if (*file_seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) { + error = -EPERM; + goto unlock; + } + + if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) { + error = mapping_deny_writable(file->f_mapping); + if (error) + goto unlock; + + error = memfd_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); + if (error) { + mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping); + goto unlock; + } + } + + *file_seals |= seals; + error = 0; + +unlock: + inode_unlock(inode); + return error; +} + +static int memfd_get_seals(struct file *file) +{ + unsigned int *seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + + return seals ? *seals : -EINVAL; +} + +long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) +{ + long error; + + switch (cmd) { + case F_ADD_SEALS: + /* disallow upper 32bit */ + if (arg > UINT_MAX) + return -EINVAL; + + error = memfd_add_seals(file, arg); + break; + case F_GET_SEALS: + error = memfd_get_seals(file); + break; + default: + error = -EINVAL; + break; + } + + return error; +} + +#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX "memfd:" +#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(MFD_NAME_PREFIX) - 1) +#define MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN (NAME_MAX - MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) + +#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB) + +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, + const char __user *, uname, + unsigned int, flags) +{ + unsigned int *file_seals; + struct file *file; + int fd, error; + char *name; + long len; + + if (!(flags & MFD_HUGETLB)) { + if (flags & ~(unsigned int)MFD_ALL_FLAGS) + return -EINVAL; + } else { + /* Allow huge page size encoding in flags. */ + if (flags & ~(unsigned int)(MFD_ALL_FLAGS | + (MFD_HUGE_MASK << MFD_HUGE_SHIFT))) + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* length includes terminating zero */ + len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); + if (len <= 0) + return -EFAULT; + if (len > MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1) + return -EINVAL; + + name = kmalloc(len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!name) + return -ENOMEM; + + strcpy(name, MFD_NAME_PREFIX); + if (copy_from_user(&name[MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN], uname, len)) { + error = -EFAULT; + goto err_name; + } + + /* terminating-zero may have changed after strnlen_user() returned */ + if (name[len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN - 1]) { + error = -EFAULT; + goto err_name; + } + + fd = get_unused_fd_flags((flags & MFD_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0); + if (fd < 0) { + error = fd; + goto err_name; + } + + if (flags & MFD_HUGETLB) { + struct user_struct *user = NULL; + + file = hugetlb_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE, &user, + HUGETLB_ANONHUGE_INODE, + (flags >> MFD_HUGE_SHIFT) & + MFD_HUGE_MASK); + } else + file = shmem_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE); + if (IS_ERR(file)) { + error = PTR_ERR(file); + goto err_fd; + } + file->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; + file->f_flags |= O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE; + + if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { + file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); + *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; + } + + fd_install(fd, file); + kfree(name); + return fd; + +err_fd: + put_unused_fd(fd); +err_name: + kfree(name); + return error; +} diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index a8bff40a10cd..9da9d0001069 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2619,243 +2619,6 @@ static loff_t shmem_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) return offset; } -/* - * We need a tag: a new tag would expand every radix_tree_node by 8 bytes, - * so reuse a tag which we firmly believe is never set or cleared on tmpfs - * or hugetlbfs because they are memory only filesystems. - */ -#define MEMFD_TAG_PINNED PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE -#define LAST_SCAN 4 /* about 150ms max */ - -static void memfd_tag_pins(struct address_space *mapping) -{ - struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void __rcu **slot; - pgoff_t start; - struct page *page; - - lru_add_drain(); - start = 0; - rcu_read_lock(); - - radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, start) { - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); - if (!page || radix_tree_exception(page)) { - if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); - continue; - } - } else if (page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) > 1) { - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, iter.index, - MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); - spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - } - - if (need_resched()) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); - cond_resched_rcu(); - } - } - rcu_read_unlock(); -} - -/* - * Setting SEAL_WRITE requires us to verify there's no pending writer. However, - * via get_user_pages(), drivers might have some pending I/O without any active - * user-space mappings (eg., direct-IO, AIO). Therefore, we look at all pages - * and see whether it has an elevated ref-count. If so, we tag them and wait for - * them to be dropped. - * The caller must guarantee that no new user will acquire writable references - * to those pages to avoid races. - */ -static int memfd_wait_for_pins(struct address_space *mapping) -{ - struct radix_tree_iter iter; - void __rcu **slot; - pgoff_t start; - struct page *page; - int error, scan; - - memfd_tag_pins(mapping); - - error = 0; - for (scan = 0; scan <= LAST_SCAN; scan++) { - if (!radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED)) - break; - - if (!scan) - lru_add_drain_all(); - else if (schedule_timeout_killable((HZ << scan) / 200)) - scan = LAST_SCAN; - - start = 0; - rcu_read_lock(); - radix_tree_for_each_tagged(slot, &mapping->page_tree, &iter, - start, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED) { - - page = radix_tree_deref_slot(slot); - if (radix_tree_exception(page)) { - if (radix_tree_deref_retry(page)) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_retry(&iter); - continue; - } - - page = NULL; - } - - if (page && - page_count(page) - page_mapcount(page) != 1) { - if (scan < LAST_SCAN) - goto continue_resched; - - /* - * On the last scan, we clean up all those tags - * we inserted; but make a note that we still - * found pages pinned. - */ - error = -EBUSY; - } - - spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); - radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree, - iter.index, MEMFD_TAG_PINNED); - spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock); -continue_resched: - if (need_resched()) { - slot = radix_tree_iter_resume(slot, &iter); - cond_resched_rcu(); - } - } - rcu_read_unlock(); - } - - return error; -} - -static unsigned int *memfd_file_seals_ptr(struct file *file) -{ - if (shmem_file(file)) - return &SHMEM_I(file_inode(file))->seals; - -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLBFS - if (is_file_hugepages(file)) - return &HUGETLBFS_I(file_inode(file))->seals; -#endif - - return NULL; -} - -#define F_ALL_SEALS (F_SEAL_SEAL | \ - F_SEAL_SHRINK | \ - F_SEAL_GROW | \ - F_SEAL_WRITE) - -static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) -{ - struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); - unsigned int *file_seals; - int error; - - /* - * SEALING - * Sealing allows multiple parties to share a tmpfs or hugetlbfs file - * but restrict access to a specific subset of file operations. Seals - * can only be added, but never removed. This way, mutually untrusted - * parties can share common memory regions with a well-defined policy. - * A malicious peer can thus never perform unwanted operations on a - * shared object. - * - * Seals are only supported on special tmpfs or hugetlbfs files and - * always affect the whole underlying inode. Once a seal is set, it - * may prevent some kinds of access to the file. Currently, the - * following seals are defined: - * SEAL_SEAL: Prevent further seals from being set on this file - * SEAL_SHRINK: Prevent the file from shrinking - * SEAL_GROW: Prevent the file from growing - * SEAL_WRITE: Prevent write access to the file - * - * As we don't require any trust relationship between two parties, we - * must prevent seals from being removed. Therefore, sealing a file - * only adds a given set of seals to the file, it never touches - * existing seals. Furthermore, the "setting seals"-operation can be - * sealed itself, which basically prevents any further seal from being - * added. - * - * Semantics of sealing are only defined on volatile files. Only - * anonymous tmpfs and hugetlbfs files support sealing. More - * importantly, seals are never written to disk. Therefore, there's - * no plan to support it on other file types. - */ - - if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)) - return -EPERM; - if (seals & ~(unsigned int)F_ALL_SEALS) - return -EINVAL; - - inode_lock(inode); - - file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - if (!file_seals) { - error = -EINVAL; - goto unlock; - } - - if (*file_seals & F_SEAL_SEAL) { - error = -EPERM; - goto unlock; - } - - if ((seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) && !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_WRITE)) { - error = mapping_deny_writable(file->f_mapping); - if (error) - goto unlock; - - error = memfd_wait_for_pins(file->f_mapping); - if (error) { - mapping_allow_writable(file->f_mapping); - goto unlock; - } - } - - *file_seals |= seals; - error = 0; - -unlock: - inode_unlock(inode); - return error; -} - -static int memfd_get_seals(struct file *file) -{ - unsigned int *seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - - return seals ? *seals : -EINVAL; -} - -long memfd_fcntl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) -{ - long error; - - switch (cmd) { - case F_ADD_SEALS: - /* disallow upper 32bit */ - if (arg > UINT_MAX) - return -EINVAL; - - error = memfd_add_seals(file, arg); - break; - case F_GET_SEALS: - error = memfd_get_seals(file); - break; - default: - error = -EINVAL; - break; - } - - return error; -} - static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) { @@ -3678,93 +3441,6 @@ static int shmem_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) return 0; } -#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX "memfd:" -#define MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(MFD_NAME_PREFIX) - 1) -#define MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN (NAME_MAX - MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN) - -#define MFD_ALL_FLAGS (MFD_CLOEXEC | MFD_ALLOW_SEALING | MFD_HUGETLB) - -SYSCALL_DEFINE2(memfd_create, - const char __user *, uname, - unsigned int, flags) -{ - unsigned int *file_seals; - struct file *file; - int fd, error; - char *name; - long len; - - if (!(flags & MFD_HUGETLB)) { - if (flags & ~(unsigned int)MFD_ALL_FLAGS) - return -EINVAL; - } else { - /* Allow huge page size encoding in flags. */ - if (flags & ~(unsigned int)(MFD_ALL_FLAGS | - (MFD_HUGE_MASK << MFD_HUGE_SHIFT))) - return -EINVAL; - } - - /* length includes terminating zero */ - len = strnlen_user(uname, MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1); - if (len <= 0) - return -EFAULT; - if (len > MFD_NAME_MAX_LEN + 1) - return -EINVAL; - - name = kmalloc(len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!name) - return -ENOMEM; - - strcpy(name, MFD_NAME_PREFIX); - if (copy_from_user(&name[MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN], uname, len)) { - error = -EFAULT; - goto err_name; - } - - /* terminating-zero may have changed after strnlen_user() returned */ - if (name[len + MFD_NAME_PREFIX_LEN - 1]) { - error = -EFAULT; - goto err_name; - } - - fd = get_unused_fd_flags((flags & MFD_CLOEXEC) ? O_CLOEXEC : 0); - if (fd < 0) { - error = fd; - goto err_name; - } - - if (flags & MFD_HUGETLB) { - struct user_struct *user = NULL; - - file = hugetlb_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE, &user, - HUGETLB_ANONHUGE_INODE, - (flags >> MFD_HUGE_SHIFT) & - MFD_HUGE_MASK); - } else - file = shmem_file_setup(name, 0, VM_NORESERVE); - if (IS_ERR(file)) { - error = PTR_ERR(file); - goto err_fd; - } - file->f_mode |= FMODE_LSEEK | FMODE_PREAD | FMODE_PWRITE; - file->f_flags |= O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE; - - if (flags & MFD_ALLOW_SEALING) { - file_seals = memfd_file_seals_ptr(file); - *file_seals &= ~F_SEAL_SEAL; - } - - fd_install(fd, file); - kfree(name); - return fd; - -err_fd: - put_unused_fd(fd); -err_name: - kfree(name); - return error; -} - #endif /* CONFIG_TMPFS */ static void shmem_put_super(struct super_block *sb) -- 2.13.6 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 1:41 ` Matthew Wilcox @ 2018-04-10 16:55 ` Khalid Aziz 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Khalid Aziz @ 2018-04-10 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Kravetz, linux-mm, linux-kernel Cc: Matthew Wilcox, Hugh Dickins, Andrea Arcangeli, Michal Hocko, Marc-André Lureau, David Herrmann, Andrew Morton On 04/09/2018 05:05 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > With the addition of memfd hugetlbfs support, we now have the situation > where memfd depends on TMPFS -or- HUGETLBFS. Previously, memfd was only > supported on tmpfs, so it made sense that the code resided in shmem.c. > In the current code, memfd is only functional if TMPFS is defined. If > HUGETLFS is defined and TMPFS is not defined, then memfd functionality > will not be available for hugetlbfs. This does not cause BUGs, just a > lack of potentially desired functionality. > > Code is restructured in the following way: > - include/linux/memfd.h is a new file containing memfd specific > definitions previously contained in shmem_fs.h. > - mm/memfd.c is a new file containing memfd specific code previously > contained in shmem.c. > - memfd specific code is removed from shmem_fs.h and shmem.c. > - A new config option MEMFD_CREATE is added that is defined if TMPFS > or HUGETLBFS is defined. > > No functional changes are made to the code: restructuring only. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> > --- > fs/Kconfig | 3 + > fs/fcntl.c | 2 +- > include/linux/memfd.h | 16 +++ > include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 13 -- > mm/Makefile | 1 + > mm/memfd.c | 344 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/shmem.c | 323 -------------------------------------------- > 7 files changed, 365 insertions(+), 337 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 include/linux/memfd.h > create mode 100644 mm/memfd.c > Reviewed-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-10 23:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-04-09 23:05 [PATCH v3 0/3] restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] mm/shmem: add __rcu annotations and properly deref radix entry Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mm/shmem: update file sealing comments and file checking Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 16:54 ` Khalid Aziz 2018-04-10 23:51 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-09 23:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: restructure memfd code Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 1:41 ` Matthew Wilcox 2018-04-10 3:03 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 23:55 ` Mike Kravetz 2018-04-10 16:55 ` Khalid Aziz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).