From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: add missing forward declaration
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:24:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180416092444.05ec6434@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180416023626.139915-1-cwahbong@google.com>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:36:25 +0800
Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@google.com> wrote:
> Without this forward declaration compile may fail if this header is
> included only for registering other probe event without struct
> pool_workqueue.
>
Is this for new work or is there a config which this fails with today?
-- Steve
> Signed-off-by: Ahbong Chang <cwahbong@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
> ---
> include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> index 2f057a494d93..9a761bc6a251 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(workqueue_work,
> TP_printk("work struct %p", __entry->work)
> );
>
> +struct pool_workqueue;
> +
> /**
> * workqueue_queue_work - called when a work gets queued
> * @req_cpu: the requested cpu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-16 2:36 [PATCH] trace: add missing forward declaration Ahbong Chang
2018-04-16 13:24 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-04-17 2:18 ` Ahbong Chang
2018-04-17 10:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-17 11:10 ` Ahbong Chang
2018-04-18 14:31 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180416092444.05ec6434@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=cwahbong@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).