[PATCH net V2] tun: fix use after free for ptr_ring

* [PATCH net V2] tun: fix use after free for ptr_ring
@ 2018-05-11  2:49 Jason Wang
  2018-05-11 17:39 ` Cong Wang
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2018-05-11  2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev, linux-kernel; +Cc: xiyou.wangcong, eric.dumazet, mst, Jason Wang

We used to initialize ptr_ring during TUNSETIFF, this is because its
size depends on the tx_queue_len of netdevice. And we try to clean it
up when socket were detached from netdevice. A race were spotted when
trying to do uninit during a read which will lead a use after free for
pointer ring. Solving this by always initialize a zero size ptr_ring
in open() and do resizing during TUNSETIFF, and then we can safely do
cleanup during close(). With this, there's no need for the workaround
that was introduced by commit 4df0bfc79904 ("tun: fix a memory leak
for tfile->tx_array").

Reported-by: syzbot+e8b902c3c3fadf0a9dba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Fixes: 1576d9860599 ("tun: switch to use skb array for tx")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
Changes from v1:
- free ptr_ring during close()
- use tun_ptr_free() during resie for safety
---
 drivers/net/tun.c | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index ef33950..9fbbb32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -681,15 +681,6 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile)
 	skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue);
 }
 
-static void tun_cleanup_tx_ring(struct tun_file *tfile)
-{
-	if (tfile->tx_ring.queue) {
-		ptr_ring_cleanup(&tfile->tx_ring, tun_ptr_free);
-		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
-		memset(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_ring));
-	}
-}
-
 static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
 {
 	struct tun_file *ntfile;
@@ -736,7 +727,8 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
 			    tun->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
 				unregister_netdevice(tun->dev);
 		}
-		tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
+		if (tun)
+			xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
 		sock_put(&tfile->sk);
 	}
 }
@@ -783,14 +775,14 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
 		tun_napi_del(tun, tfile);
 		/* Drop read queue */
 		tun_queue_purge(tfile);
+		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
 		sock_put(&tfile->sk);
-		tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(tfile, tmp, &tun->disabled, next) {
 		tun_enable_queue(tfile);
 		tun_queue_purge(tfile);
+		xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
 		sock_put(&tfile->sk);
-		tun_cleanup_tx_ring(tfile);
 	}
 	BUG_ON(tun->numdisabled != 0);
 
@@ -834,7 +826,8 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
 	}
 
 	if (!tfile->detached &&
-	    ptr_ring_init(&tfile->tx_ring, dev->tx_queue_len, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+	    ptr_ring_resize(&tfile->tx_ring, dev->tx_queue_len,
+			    GFP_KERNEL, tun_ptr_free)) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -3219,6 +3212,11 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
 					    &tun_proto, 0);
 	if (!tfile)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (ptr_ring_init(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, GFP_KERNEL)) {
+		sk_free(&tfile->sk);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
 	RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
 	tfile->flags = 0;
 	tfile->ifindex = 0;
@@ -3239,8 +3237,6 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
 
 	sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
 
-	memset(&tfile->tx_ring, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_ring));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3249,6 +3245,7 @@ static int tun_chr_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	struct tun_file *tfile = file->private_data;
 
 	tun_detach(tfile, true);
+	ptr_ring_cleanup(&tfile->tx_ring, tun_ptr_free);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread