linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH RFC rcu/x86] Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback
@ 2018-05-25 19:18 Paul E. McKenney
  2018-05-25 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-05-25 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: tglx, mingo, hpa, josh, rostedt, mathieu.desnoyers, jiangshanlai,
	peterz, bigeasy, qianyue.zj, efault

The x86/mtrr code does horrific things because hardware. It uses
stop_machine_from_inactive_cpu(), which does a wakeup (of the stopper
thread on another CPU), which uses RCU, all before the CPU is onlined.

RCU complains about this, because wakeups use RCU and RCU does
(rightfully) not consider offline CPUs for grace-periods.

Fix this by initializing RCU way early in the MTRR case.

Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Add !SMP support, per 0day Test Robot report. ]
---

This should have been in last week's RCU pull request, but slipped through
the cracks.  It also needed fixes for a bug located by 0day Test Robot.
If I don't hear otherwise, I will send a pull request on Tuesday May 29,
Pacific Time.

 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c |    4 ++++
 include/linux/rcupdate.h        |    1 -
 include/linux/rcutiny.h         |    1 +
 include/linux/rcutree.h         |    1 +
 kernel/rcu/tree.c               |    9 +++++++++
 5 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
index 7468de429087..3ea0047beb40 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 #include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/syscore_ops.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 
 #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/e820/api.h>
@@ -793,6 +794,9 @@ void mtrr_ap_init(void)
 
 	if (!use_intel() || mtrr_aps_delayed_init)
 		return;
+
+	rcu_cpu_starting(smp_processor_id());
+
 	/*
 	 * Ideally we should hold mtrr_mutex here to avoid mtrr entries
 	 * changed, but this routine will be called in cpu boot time,
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 19d235fefdb9..e679b175b411 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ void rcu_sched_qs(void);
 void rcu_bh_qs(void);
 void rcu_check_callbacks(int user);
 void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu);
-void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
 void rcutree_migrate_callbacks(int cpu);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_STALL_COMMON
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutiny.h b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
index ce9beec35e34..7b3c82e8a625 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutiny.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutiny.h
@@ -132,5 +132,6 @@ static inline void rcu_all_qs(void) { barrier(); }
 #define rcutree_offline_cpu      NULL
 #define rcutree_dead_cpu         NULL
 #define rcutree_dying_cpu        NULL
+static inline void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) { }
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_RCUTINY_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index 448f20f27396..914655848ef6 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -101,5 +101,6 @@ int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 int rcutree_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu);
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_RCUTREE_H */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4fccdfa25716..aa7cade1b9f3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3665,6 +3665,8 @@ int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, rcu_cpu_started);
+
 /*
  * Mark the specified CPU as being online so that subsequent grace periods
  * (both expedited and normal) will wait on it.  Note that this means that
@@ -3686,6 +3688,11 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 	struct rcu_state *rsp;
 
+	if (per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu))
+		return;
+
+	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 1;
+
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
 		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
 		rnp = rdp->mynode;
@@ -3742,6 +3749,8 @@ void rcu_report_dead(unsigned int cpu)
 	preempt_enable();
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
 		rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu(cpu, rsp);
+
+	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_started, cpu) = 0;
 }
 
 /* Migrate the dead CPU's callbacks to the current CPU. */

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC rcu/x86] Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback
  2018-05-25 19:18 [PATCH RFC rcu/x86] Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback Paul E. McKenney
@ 2018-05-25 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
  2018-05-25 19:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2018-05-25 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul E. McKenney
  Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, josh, mathieu.desnoyers,
	jiangshanlai, peterz, bigeasy, qianyue.zj, efault

On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:18:02 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> [ paulmck: Add !SMP support, per 0day Test Robot report. ]

Somehow I read this as:

  [ paulmck: Add NR_CPUS=0 support ]

no idea why.

-- Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH RFC rcu/x86] Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback
  2018-05-25 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2018-05-25 19:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2018-05-25 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven Rostedt
  Cc: linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, josh, mathieu.desnoyers,
	jiangshanlai, peterz, bigeasy, qianyue.zj, efault

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:19:33PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:18:02 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > [ paulmck: Add !SMP support, per 0day Test Robot report. ]
> 
> Somehow I read this as:
> 
>   [ paulmck: Add NR_CPUS=0 support ]
> 
> no idea why.

;-) ;-) ;-)

Well, there is a debate on out-of-thin-air (OOTA) values in the C11 and
C++11 memory models.  Maybe that is related?  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-25 19:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-25 19:18 [PATCH RFC rcu/x86] Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-25 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-25 19:44   ` Paul E. McKenney

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).