[PATCH] Staging: octeon: Apply Licence and resolves warnings according to TODO list. There are also a few "checks" that probably should revised but i think most of them could be resolved by breaking down cvmx_usb_poll_channel()

[PATCH] Staging: octeon: Apply Licence and resolves warnings according to TODO list. There are also a few "checks" that probably should revised but i think most of them could be resolved by breaking down cvmx_usb_poll_channel()

[Georgios Tsotsos]

Signed-off-by: Georgios Tsotsos <tsotsos@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
index cded30f145aa..472ad5917ad2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /*
  * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public
  * License.  See the file "COPYING" in the main directory of this archive
@@ -377,27 +378,29 @@ struct octeon_hcd {
 };
 
 /* This macro spins on a register waiting for it to reach a condition. */
-#define CVMX_WAIT_FOR_FIELD32(address, _union, cond, timeout_usec)	    \
-	({int result;							    \
-	do {								    \
-		u64 done = cvmx_get_cycle() + (u64)timeout_usec *	    \
-			   octeon_get_clock_rate() / 1000000;		    \
-		union _union c;						    \
-									    \
-		while (1) {						    \
-			c.u32 = cvmx_usb_read_csr32(usb, address);	    \
-									    \
-			if (cond) {					    \
-				result = 0;				    \
-				break;					    \
-			} else if (cvmx_get_cycle() > done) {		    \
-				result = -1;				    \
-				break;					    \
-			} else						    \
-				__delay(100);				    \
-		}							    \
-	} while (0);							    \
-	result; })
+#define CVMX_WAIT_FOR_FIELD32(address, _union, cond, timeout_usec)	\
+({									\
+	int result;							\
+	do {								\
+		u64 done = cvmx_get_cycle() + (u64)(timeout_usec) *	\
+			   octeon_get_clock_rate() / 1000000;		\
+		union _union c;						\
+									\
+		while (1) {						\
+			c.u32 = cvmx_usb_read_csr32(usb, address);	\
+									\
+			if (cond) {					\
+				result = 0;				\
+				break;					\
+			} else if (cvmx_get_cycle() > done) {		\
+				result = -1;				\
+				break;					\
+			} else						\
+				__delay(100);				\
+		}							\
+	} while (0);							\
+	result;								\
+})
 
 /*
  * This macro logically sets a single field in a CSR. It does the sequence
@@ -2636,12 +2639,14 @@ static int cvmx_usb_poll_channel(struct octeon_hcd *usb, int channel)
 				hcintmsk.u32 = 0;
 				hcintmsk.s.chhltdmsk = 1;
 				cvmx_usb_write_csr32(usb,
-						     CVMX_USBCX_HCINTMSKX(channel, usb->index),
-						     hcintmsk.u32);
+						CVMX_USBCX_HCINTMSKX(channel,
+						usb->index),
+						hcintmsk.u32);
 				usbc_hcchar.s.chdis = 1;
 				cvmx_usb_write_csr32(usb,
-						     CVMX_USBCX_HCCHARX(channel, usb->index),
-						     usbc_hcchar.u32);
+						CVMX_USBCX_HCCHARX(channel,
+						usb->index),
+						usbc_hcchar.u32);
 				return 0;
 			} else if (usbc_hcint.s.xfercompl) {
 				/*
diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h
index 3353aefe662e..769c36cf6614 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
 /*
  * Octeon HCD hardware register definitions.
  *
-- 
2.16.4

Re: [PATCH] Staging: octeon: Apply Licence and resolves warnings according to TODO list. There are also a few "checks" that probably should revised but i think most of them could be resolved by breaking down cvmx_usb_poll_channel()

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 01:21:17AM +0300, Georgios Tsotsos wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Georgios Tsotsos <tsotsos@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.h |  1 +

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch did many different things all at once, making it difficult
  to review.  All Linux kernel patches need to only do one thing at a
  time.  If you need to do multiple things (such as clean up all coding
  style issues in a file/driver), do it in a sequence of patches, each
  one doing only one thing.  This will make it easier to review the
  patches to ensure that they are correct, and to help alleviate any
  merge issues that larger patches can cause.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot