linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Whitmore <arigead@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor use of enum dm_dig_sta_e - Style
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 10:50:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180729095009.GB21046@xux707-tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180729081726.GA2216@kroah.com>

On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:17:26AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 12:28:18AM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> > Refactor the use of the enumerated type dm_dig_sta_e, which is not
> > actually used for type checking by the compiler.
> > 
> > The enumerated type defines values for the enumeration, which are used
> > by both dig_state and dig_highpwr_state, (members of the struct dig).
> > Both of those variables were defined as being of type u8. This negates
> > any usefulness of the use of the enumeration, (compiler type checking).
> > 
> > To make use of the compiler's type-checking the two member variables,
> > dig_state and dig_highpwr_state have been changed to being of type
> > enum dm_dig_sta_e. The enumerated type has been moved above the
> > struct dig definition so that the enumeration is already defined when
> > compiler reaches the two types using the enumerated type.
> > 
> > In addition the 'typedef' of the enumerated type has been removed to
> > clear the checkpatch issue with declaring new types.
> > 
> > These changes, whilst convoluted, are purely coding style in nature and
> > should not impact runtime code execution.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.h | 18 +++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.h
> > index e86dda99c223..2444e1c1357b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.h
> > @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@
> >  
> >  
> >  /*------------------------------Define structure----------------------------*/
> > +
> > +enum dm_dig_sta_e {
> 
> Don't end an enum with "_e", as that's not needed at all.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Oh! Thanks for that, it never occured to me that the '_e' was notation.
Again I'll fix up all those affected and resend.

jwhitmore

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-29  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-27 23:28 [PATCH 00/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enums r8192U_dm.h -Style John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] staging:rtl8192u: Remove unused DM_check_fsync_time_interval - Style John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor use of enum dm_dig_sta_e " John Whitmore
2018-07-29  8:17   ` Greg KH
2018-07-29  9:50     ` John Whitmore [this message]
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enum dm_ratr_sta_e usage " John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] staging:rtl8192u: Remove enum dm_dig_op_e John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enum dm_dig_alg_e - Style John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] staging:rtl8192u: Remove unused enum dm_dig_dbg_e " John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor dm_dig_connect_e " John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enum dm_dig_pd_th_e " John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enum dm_dig_cs_ratio_e " John Whitmore
2018-07-27 23:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] staging:rtl8192u: Refactor enum DM_CCK_Rx_Path_Method " John Whitmore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180729095009.GB21046@xux707-tw \
    --to=arigead@gmail.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johnfwhitmore@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).