linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Milind Chabbi <chabbi.milind@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Set breakpoint as disabled in modify_user_hw_breakpoint error path
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 18:30:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180809163015.GA23170@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180809141713.GB22636@redhat.com>

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 04:17:13PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/09, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > @@ -523,8 +523,10 @@ int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *att
> >  		perf_event_disable(bp);
> >
> >  	err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(bp, attr, false);
> > -	if (err)
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		bp->attr.disabled = 1;
> >  		return err;
> 
> Yes, but on the second thought... Can't we simply do
> 
> 	int modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr)
> 	{
> 		int err;
> 
> 		/*
> 		 * modify_user_hw_breakpoint can be invoked with IRQs disabled and hence it
> 		 * will not be possible to raise IPIs that invoke __perf_event_disable.
> 		 * So call the function directly after making sure we are targeting the
> 		 * current task.
> 		 */
> 		if (irqs_disabled() && bp->ctx && bp->ctx->task == current)
> 			perf_event_disable_local(bp);
> 		else
> 			perf_event_disable(bp);
> 
> 		err = modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(bp, attr, false);
> 
> 		if (!bp.attr->disabled)
> 			perf_event_enable(bp);
> 
> 		return err;
> 	}
> 
> instead of this and the next patch?
> 
> We can do this because (as you pointed out) validate_hw_breakpoint() has already
> gone in -tip tree, and (afaics) modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check() never changes
> perf_event's state on failure, so we can safely "restart" this bp if it was enabled
> before.
> 
> 1. This is what we had before the recent f67b15037a7a50c57f72e69a6d59941ad90a0f0f
>    "perf/hwbp: Simplify the perf-hwbp code, fix documentation".
> 
>    Note that this commit was actually the bug fix which introduced another problem
>    fixed by your 2/5.
> 
>    But see above, perf_event_enable() is no longer unsafe after
>    modify_user_hw_breakpoint_check(), we can restore the previous semantics.
> 
> 2. This matches perf_event_modify_breakpoint(). Which btw can be simplified a bit,
>    it too can simply do
> 
> 		if (!bp->attr.disabled)
> 			_perf_event_enable(bp);
> 
> 		return err;

yep, seems good.. will send new version

thanks,
jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-09 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-09 12:03 [PATCHv2 0/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix breakpoint modify Jiri Olsa
2018-08-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf tests: Add breakpoint modify tests Jiri Olsa
2018-08-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Modify breakpoint even if the new attr has disabled set Jiri Olsa
2018-08-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Remove superfluous bp->attr.disabled = 0 Jiri Olsa
2018-08-09 13:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Set breakpoint as disabled in modify_user_hw_breakpoint error path Jiri Olsa
2018-08-09 14:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-08-09 16:30     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-08-28 14:29       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-08-28 14:38         ` Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28 14:39           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-08-09 12:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add fallback code for ptrace_set_breakpoint_addr Jiri Olsa
2018-08-28 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 0/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Fix breakpoint modify Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180809163015.GA23170@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chabbi.milind@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf/hw_breakpoint: Set breakpoint as disabled in modify_user_hw_breakpoint error path' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).