linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] spi:fix IDR collision on systems with both fixed and dynamic SPI bus numbers
@ 2018-08-13 16:48 Kirill Kapranov
  2018-08-14 14:18 ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kirill Kapranov @ 2018-08-13 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-spi, linux-kernel, broonie, l.stach; +Cc: Kirill Kapranov

On systems where some controllers get a dynamic ID assigned and some have
a fixed number (e.g. from ACPI tables), the current implementation might
run into an IDR collision: in case of a fixed bus number is gotten by a
driver (but not marked busy in IDR tree) and a driver with dynamic bus
number gets the same ID and predictably fails.

Fix this by means of checking-in fixed IDsin IDR as far as dynamic ones
at the moment of the controller registration.

Fixes: 9b61e302210e (spi: Pick spi bus number from Linux idr or spi alias)

Signed-off-by: Kirill Kapranov <kirill.kapranov@compulab.co.il>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index ec395a6baf9c..97e303185d5b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -2170,6 +2170,15 @@ int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 		if (WARN(id < 0, "couldn't get idr"))
 			return id;
 		ctlr->bus_num = id;
+	} else {
+	/* devices with a fixed bus num must check-in with the num */
+		mutex_lock(&board_lock);
+		id = idr_alloc(&spi_master_idr, ctlr, ctlr->bus_num,
+			ctlr->bus_num + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+		mutex_unlock(&board_lock);
+		if (WARN(id < 0, "couldn't get idr"))
+			return id == -ENOSPC ? -EBUSY : id;
+		ctlr->bus_num = id;
 	}
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctlr->queue);
 	spin_lock_init(&ctlr->queue_lock);
-- 
2.11.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] spi:fix IDR collision on systems with both fixed and dynamic SPI bus numbers
  2018-08-13 16:48 [PATCH] spi:fix IDR collision on systems with both fixed and dynamic SPI bus numbers Kirill Kapranov
@ 2018-08-14 14:18 ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2018-08-14 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kirill Kapranov; +Cc: linux-spi, linux-kernel, l.stach

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 667 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 07:48:10PM +0300, Kirill Kapranov wrote:
> On systems where some controllers get a dynamic ID assigned and some have
> a fixed number (e.g. from ACPI tables), the current implementation might
> run into an IDR collision: in case of a fixed bus number is gotten by a
> driver (but not marked busy in IDR tree) and a driver with dynamic bus
> number gets the same ID and predictably fails.

Is this something that's actually happened for you?

> +	} else {
> +	/* devices with a fixed bus num must check-in with the num */
> +		mutex_lock(&board_lock);

The indentation here is weird, the comment isn't aligned with the code
it's commenting on.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-14 14:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-13 16:48 [PATCH] spi:fix IDR collision on systems with both fixed and dynamic SPI bus numbers Kirill Kapranov
2018-08-14 14:18 ` Mark Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).