linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Yannik Sembritzki <yannik@sembritzki.me>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	"Justin M. Forbes" <jforbes@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix kexec forbidding kernels signed with custom platform keys to boot
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 08:52:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180816005206.GA5915@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180815174247.GB29541@redhat.com>

On 08/15/18 at 01:42pm, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 07:27:33PM +0200, Yannik Sembritzki wrote:
> > Would this be okay?
> 
> [ CC dave young, Baoquan, Justin Forbes]
> 
> Hi Yannik,
> 
> I am reading that bug and wondering that what broke it. It used to work,
> so some change broke it. 
> 
> Justin said that we have been signing fedora kernels with fedora keys so
> looks like no change there.
> 
> Previously, I think all the keys used to go in system keyring and it
> used to work. Is it somehow because of split in builtin keyring and
> secondary system keyring. Could it be that fedora key used to show
> up in system keyring previously and it worked but now it shows up
> in secondary system keyring and by default we don't use keys from
> that keyring for signature verification?

There was a Fedora bug below:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470995

I posted a fix here but bobody responsed, I think I obviously did not
consider the "trust build system only" point from Linus:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2017-November/019632.html

But either above patch or defining a macro for the "1UL" in cert header
file works.

Since nobody reviewed my patch so later I submitted a Fedora only patch
which is similar with Yannik's and merged in Fedora tree:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1450772&action=edit

> 
> Thanks
> Vivek
> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > index 7326078e..2ba47e24 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
> >  #define MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR   0x100000
> >  #define MIN_INITRD_LOAD_ADDR   0x1000000
> >  
> > +// Allow both builtin trusted keys and secondary trusted keys
> > +#define TRUST_FULL_KEYRING     (void *)1UL
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This is a place holder for all boot loader specific data structure which
> >   * gets allocated in one call but gets freed much later during cleanup
> > @@ -532,7 +535,7 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
> >  static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long
> > kernel_len)
> >  {
> >         return verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> > -                                      NULL,
> > +                                      TRUST_FULL_KEYRING,
> >                                        VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> >  }
> >  #endif
> > --
> > 
> > On 15.08.2018 18:54, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > This needs more people involved, and at least a sign-off.
> > >
> > > It looks ok, but I think we need a #define for the magical (void *)1UL
> > > thing. I see the use in verify_pkcs7_signature(), but still.
> > >
> > >               Linus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:11 AM Yannik Sembritzki <yannik@sembritzki.me> wrote:
> > >> ---
> > >>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 2 +-
> > >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > >> index 7326078e..eaaa125d 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> > >> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
> > >>  static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
> > >>  {
> > >>         return verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> > >> -                                      NULL,
> > >> +                                      (void *)1UL,
> > >>                                        VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> > >>  }
> > >>  #endif
> > >> --
> > >> 2.17.1
> > >>
> > >> The exact scenario under which this issue occurs is described here:
> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554113
> > >>
> > 

Thanks
Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-08-16  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-15 10:00 [PATCH] Fix kexec forbidding kernels signed with custom platform keys to boot Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 17:27   ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 17:37     ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 17:42     ` Vivek Goyal
2018-08-15 18:44       ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 18:58       ` Vivek Goyal
2018-08-15 19:06         ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 19:49           ` Vivek Goyal
2018-08-15 20:47             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 20:53               ` James Bottomley
2018-08-15 21:08               ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 21:13                 ` James Bottomley
2018-08-15 21:31                   ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 21:40                     ` James Bottomley
2018-08-15 21:50                       ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 21:57                     ` Vivek Goyal
2018-08-15 22:14                       ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 21:52                   ` Vivek Goyal
2018-08-15 21:57                     ` James Bottomley
2018-08-15 21:14                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-16 13:51             ` David Howells
2018-08-16 15:16               ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16 15:42                 ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16 15:49               ` David Howells
2018-08-16 15:56                 ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16 16:56                   ` David Laight
2018-08-16 17:15                     ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16 20:31                 ` David Howells
2018-08-17  0:07                   ` James Bottomley
2018-08-17  8:24                   ` David Howells
2018-08-17 14:58                     ` James Bottomley
2018-08-17 15:42                       ` Justin Forbes
2018-08-17 16:02                         ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16  0:52       ` Dave Young [this message]
2018-08-16  0:55         ` Dave Young
2018-08-16 12:13       ` David Howells
2018-08-16 14:22         ` James Bottomley
2018-08-16 14:43         ` David Howells
2018-08-16 14:59           ` James Bottomley
2018-08-17 17:00             ` Alan Cox
2018-08-15 17:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 18:19       ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 18:22         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 19:42           ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix kexec forbidding kernels signed with keys in the secondary keyring " Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-16 18:02             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 19:42           ` [PATCH 1/2] " Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 19:42           ` [PATCH 2/2] Replace magic for trusting the secondary keyring with #define Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 21:14             ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-15 21:19               ` [PATCH 2/2] [FIXED] " Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-15 22:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-15 22:07                   ` [PATCH 2/2] [FIXED v2] " Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-16  1:11                     ` Dave Young
2018-08-16  7:43                       ` Yannik Sembritzki
2018-08-16  8:02                         ` Dave Young
2018-08-16  8:20                           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-08-16 12:46                       ` Vivek Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180816005206.GA5915@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jforbes@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yannik@sembritzki.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).