linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] perf_event.h ABI visibility question
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:50:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180824085042.GL24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1808231401440.28868@macbook-air>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:25:06PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> 
> I notice that Linux 4.18 has the following changeset which changes the
> user visible perf_event.h file
> 
> 	commit 6cbc304f2f360f25cc8607817239d6f4a2fd3dc5
> 	Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> 	Date:   Thu May 10 15:48:41 2018 +0200
> 
>     perf/x86/intel: Fix unwind errors from PEBS entries (mk-II)
> 
> which contains
> 
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
>         PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR                   = 1U << 19,
>  
>         PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 20,             /* non-ABI */
> +
> +       __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY           = 1ULL << 63,
>  };
> 
> 
> Is this supposed to be a user-visible interface?
> 
> I realize that if the user tries to set anything above PERF_SAMPLE_MAX
> it will be caught and flagged as EINVAL.
> 
> However even with the double-underscore hint in 
> __PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN_EARLY the value is still in the user-visible 
> header so it's now part of the ABI and I guess the manpage has to document it.

Hurphm.. visible yes, but as you say, also quite useless. Does it really
make sense to document that?


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-24  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-23 18:25 [perf] perf_event.h ABI visibility question Vince Weaver
2018-08-24  8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-08-24 21:09   ` Vince Weaver
2018-08-27  7:52     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-28 17:51       ` Vince Weaver
2018-08-29 12:13         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180824085042.GL24124@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).