From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mst@redhat.com
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:05:44 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180913.110544.1829014151772495898.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180913135833-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:02:13 -0400
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 09:28:19AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 11:16:58 +0800
>>
>> > This series tries to batch submitting packets to underlayer socket
>> > through msg_control during sendmsg(). This is done by:
>> ...
>>
>> Series applied, thanks Jason.
>
> Going over it now I don't see a lot to complain about, but I'd
> appreciate a bit more time for review in the future. 3 days ok?
I try to handle every patchwork entry within 48 hours, more
specifically 2 business days.
Given the rate at which patches flow through networking, I think
this is both reasonable and necessary.
One always have the option to send a quick reply to the list saying
"Please wait for my review, I'll get to it in the next day or two."
which I will certainly honor.
Thank you.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-13 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 3:16 [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:16 ` [PATCH net-next V2 01/11] net: sock: introduce SOCK_XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 02/11] tuntap: switch to use XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 03/11] tuntap: enable bh early during processing XDP Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 04/11] tuntap: simplify error handling in tun_build_skb() Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 05/11] tuntap: tweak on the path of skb XDP case " Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 06/11] tuntap: split out XDP logic Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 07/11] tuntap: move XDP flushing out of tun_do_xdp() Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 08/11] tun: switch to new type of msg_control Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 09/11] tuntap: accept an array of XDP buffs through sendmsg() Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 10/11] tap: " Jason Wang
2018-09-12 3:17 ` [PATCH net-next V2 11/11] vhost_net: batch submitting XDP buffers to underlayer sockets Jason Wang
2018-09-13 18:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-14 3:11 ` Jason Wang
2018-09-13 16:28 ` [PATCH net-next V2 00/11] vhost_net TX batching David Miller
2018-09-13 18:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-09-13 18:05 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180913.110544.1829014151772495898.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).