linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@siemens.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Problem] Cache line starvation
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:34:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926073426.GA31905@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180921120226.6xjgr4oiho22ex75@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:02:26PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Instrumentation show always the picture:
> 
> CPU0                                         CPU1
> => do_syscall_64                              => do_syscall_64
> => SyS_ptrace                                   => syscall_slow_exit_work
> => ptrace_check_attach                          => ptrace_do_notify / rt_read_unlock 
> => wait_task_inactive                              rt_spin_lock_slowunlock()
>    -> while task_running()                         __rt_mutex_unlock_common()
>   /   check_task_state()                           mark_wakeup_next_waiter()
>  |     raw_spin_lock_irq(&p->pi_lock);             raw_spin_lock(&current->pi_lock);
>  |     .                                               .
>  |     raw_spin_unlock_irq(&p->pi_lock);               .
>   \  cpu_relax()                                       .
>    -                                                   .
>     *IRQ*                                          <lock acquired>
> 
> In the error case we observe that the while() loop is repeated more than
> 5000 times which indicates that the pi_lock can be acquired. CPU1 on the
> other side does not make progress waiting for the same lock with interrupts
> disabled.

I've tried really hard to reproduce this in userspace, but so far have
not had any luck. Looks to be a real tricky thing to make happen.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 12:02 [Problem] Cache line starvation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-21 12:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-21 12:50   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-21 12:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-21 12:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  7:51   ` Catalin Marinas
2018-10-03  8:07     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  8:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-03 10:43         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-03  8:23     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-26  7:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-09-26  8:04   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-26 12:53 ` Will Deacon
2018-09-27 14:25   ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2018-09-27 14:41     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2018-09-27 14:47       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-28  9:05         ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2018-09-28 15:26           ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2018-09-28 19:26         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-28 19:34           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-10-02  6:31 ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180926073426.GA31905@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.wagner@siemens.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).