linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] f2fs: avoid f2fs_bug_on if f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:49:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180926194932.GA44119@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2996d79d-c791-1a22-8abd-ad37d48edf17@huawei.com>

On 09/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/9/26 9:10, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2018/9/26 8:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 09/21, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2018/9/21 5:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> On 09/20, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>> On 2018/9/19 1:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>>> This patch avoids BUG_ON when f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO during
> >>>>>> xfstests/generic/475.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> Change log from v1:
> >>>>>>  - propagate errno
> >>>>>>  - drop sum_pages
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 10 +++++-----
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  2 +-
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/gc.c         |  9 +++++++++
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/node.c       | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/recovery.c   |  2 ++
> >>>>>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c    |  3 +++
> >>>>>>  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>>>> index 01e0d8f5bbbe..1ddf332ce4b2 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>>>> @@ -119,11 +119,8 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t index)
> >>>>>>  		if (PTR_ERR(page) == -EIO &&
> >>>>>>  				++count <= DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT)
> >>>>>>  			goto retry;
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
> >>>>>> -		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>  	return page;
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> @@ -1512,7 +1509,10 @@ int f2fs_write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  	ckpt->checkpoint_ver = cpu_to_le64(++ckpt_ver);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	/* write cached NAT/SIT entries to NAT/SIT area */
> >>>>>> -	f2fs_flush_nat_entries(sbi, cpc);
> >>>>>> +	err = f2fs_flush_nat_entries(sbi, cpc);
> >>>>>> +	if (err)
> >>>>>> +		goto stop;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To make sure, if partial NAT pages become dirty, flush them back to device
> >>>>> outside checkpoint() is not harmful, right?
> >>>>
> >>>> I think so.
> >>>
> >>> Oh, one more case, now we use NAT #0, if partial NAT pages were
> >>> writebacked, then we start to use NAT #1, later, in another checkpoint(),
> >>> we update those NAT pages again, we will write them to NAT #0, which is
> >>> belong to last valid checkpoint(), it's may cause corrupted checkpoint in
> >>> scenario of SPO. So it's harmfull, right?
> >>
> >> We already stopped checkpoint anymore, so there'd be no way to proceed another
> >> checkpoint. Am I missing something?
> > 
> > You're right, we have called f2fs_stop_checkpoint(), so we are safe now. :)
> 
> Can we allow to writeback fs metadata (NAT/SIT/SSA) in prior to checkpoint
> to mitigate IO stress of checkpoint?

What's the point related to this patch?
Anyway, do you mean f2fs_write_meta_pages is not enough?

> 
> Maybe below conditions can be consider to trigger writebacking:
> a) dirty count of meta (NAT/SIT/SSA) exceeds threshold
> b) exceed time threshold
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>>  	f2fs_flush_sit_entries(sbi, cpc);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	/* unlock all the fs_lock[] in do_checkpoint() */
> >>>>>> @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ int f2fs_write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  		f2fs_release_discard_addrs(sbi);
> >>>>>>  	else
> >>>>>>  		f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> +stop:
> >>>>>>  	unblock_operations(sbi);
> >>>>>>  	stat_inc_cp_count(sbi->stat_info);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>> index a0c868127a7c..29021dbc8f2a 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ int f2fs_recover_xattr_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page);
> >>>>>>  int f2fs_recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page);
> >>>>>>  int f2fs_restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  			unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum);
> >>>>>> -void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
> >>>>>> +int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
> >>>>>>  int f2fs_build_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>>>  void f2fs_destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >>>>>>  int __init f2fs_create_node_manager_caches(void);
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>>>>> index 4bcc8a59fdef..c7d14282dbf4 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> >>>>>> @@ -1070,6 +1070,15 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  	/* reference all summary page */
> >>>>>>  	while (segno < end_segno) {
> >>>>>>  		sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, segno++);
> >>>>>> +		if (IS_ERR(sum_page)) {
> >>>>>> +			end_segno = segno - 1;
> >>>>>> +			for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
> >>>>>> +				sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> >>>>>> +						GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
> >>>>>> +				f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> find_get_page() will add one more reference on page, so we need to call
> >>>>> f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0) twice.
> >>>>
> >>>> Done.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +			}
> >>>>>> +			return PTR_ERR(sum_page);
> >>>>>> +		}
> >>>>>>  		unlock_page(sum_page);
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> index fa2381c0bc47..79b6fee354f7 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ static struct page *get_next_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	/* get current nat block page with lock */
> >>>>>>  	src_page = get_current_nat_page(sbi, nid);
> >>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(src_page))
> >>>>>> +		return src_page;
> >>>>>>  	dst_page = f2fs_grab_meta_page(sbi, dst_off);
> >>>>>>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PageDirty(src_page));
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> @@ -2265,15 +2267,19 @@ static int __f2fs_build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  						nm_i->nat_block_bitmap)) {
> >>>>>>  			struct page *page = get_current_nat_page(sbi, nid);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> -			ret = scan_nat_page(sbi, page, nid);
> >>>>>> -			f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> >>>>>> +			if (IS_ERR(page)) {
> >>>>>> +				ret = PTR_ERR(page);
> >>>>>> +			} else {
> >>>>>> +				ret = scan_nat_page(sbi, page, nid);
> >>>>>> +				f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> >>>>>> +			}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  			if (ret) {
> >>>>>>  				up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >>>>>>  				f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !mount);
> >>>>>>  				f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR,
> >>>>>>  					"NAT is corrupt, run fsck to fix it");
> >>>>>> -				return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>> +				return ret;
> >>>>>>  			}
> >>>>>>  		}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> @@ -2700,7 +2706,7 @@ static void __update_nat_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t start_nid,
> >>>>>>  		__clear_bit_le(nat_index, nm_i->full_nat_bits);
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> -static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>> +static int __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  		struct nat_entry_set *set, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  {
> >>>>>>  	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
> >>>>>> @@ -2724,6 +2730,9 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  		down_write(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
> >>>>>>  	} else {
> >>>>>>  		page = get_next_nat_page(sbi, start_nid);
> >>>>>> +		if (IS_ERR(page))
> >>>>>> +			return PTR_ERR(page);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>>  		nat_blk = page_address(page);
> >>>>>>  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !nat_blk);
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>> @@ -2769,12 +2778,13 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  		radix_tree_delete(&NM_I(sbi)->nat_set_root, set->set);
> >>>>>>  		kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_set_slab, set);
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>> +	return 0;
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  /*
> >>>>>>   * This function is called during the checkpointing process.
> >>>>>>   */
> >>>>>> -void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>> +int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  {
> >>>>>>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> >>>>>>  	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
> >>>>>> @@ -2784,6 +2794,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  	unsigned int found;
> >>>>>>  	nid_t set_idx = 0;
> >>>>>>  	LIST_HEAD(sets);
> >>>>>> +	int err = 0;
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	/* during unmount, let's flush nat_bits before checking dirty_nat_cnt */
> >>>>>>  	if (enabled_nat_bits(sbi, cpc)) {
> >>>>>> @@ -2793,7 +2804,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	if (!nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)
> >>>>>> -		return;
> >>>>>> +		return 0;
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>> @@ -2816,11 +2827,16 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	/* flush dirty nats in nat entry set */
> >>>>>> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &sets, set_list)
> >>>>>> -		__flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
> >>>>>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &sets, set_list) {
> >>>>>> +		err = __flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
> >>>>>> +		if (err)
> >>>>>> +			break;
> >>>>>> +	}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
> >>>>>>  	/* Allow dirty nats by node block allocation in write_begin */
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +	return err;
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  static int __get_nat_bitmaps(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> index 56d34193a74b..ba678efe7cad 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
> >>>>>> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>  	}
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, segno);
> >>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(sum_page))
> >>>>>> +		return PTR_ERR(sum_page);
> >>>>>>  	sum_node = (struct f2fs_summary_block *)page_address(sum_page);
> >>>>>>  	sum = sum_node->entries[blkoff];
> >>>>>>  	f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 1);
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>>> index aa96a371aaf8..ab7386a7e9d3 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>>>> @@ -2487,6 +2487,7 @@ static void change_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> >>>>>>  	__next_free_blkoff(sbi, curseg, 0);
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  	sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, new_segno);
> >>>>>> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, IS_ERR(sum_page));
> >>>>>>  	sum_node = (struct f2fs_summary_block *)page_address(sum_page);
> >>>>>>  	memcpy(curseg->sum_blk, sum_node, SUM_ENTRY_SIZE);
> >>>>>>  	f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 1);
> >>>>>> @@ -3971,6 +3972,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>  			se = &sit_i->sentries[start];
> >>>>>>  			page = get_current_sit_page(sbi, start);
> >>>>>> +			if (IS_ERR(page))
> >>>>>> +				return PTR_ERR(page);
> >>>>>>  			sit_blk = (struct f2fs_sit_block *)page_address(page);
> >>>>>>  			sit = sit_blk->entries[SIT_ENTRY_OFFSET(sit_i, start)];
> >>>>>>  			f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> .
> >>>>
> >>
> >> .
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > 
> > .
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-26 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18  2:18 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: report ENOENT correct in f2fs_rename Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18  2:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid f2fs_bug_on if f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 13:16   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-18 17:55     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 17:56   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19  1:45     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-19 22:47       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20  6:07     ` Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:46       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21  1:30         ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26  0:18           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26  1:10             ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26  8:31               ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 19:49                 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2018-09-27  1:14                   ` Chao Yu
2018-09-27  4:58                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-27  5:45                       ` Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:48     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-27 12:09       ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 12:47 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: report ENOENT correct in f2fs_rename Chao Yu
2018-09-18 17:59   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19  1:48     ` Chao Yu
2018-09-19  0:47 ` Sahitya Tummala
2018-09-19 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20  6:14   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:35   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21  1:31     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180926194932.GA44119@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).