linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] f2fs: avoid f2fs_bug_on if f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 13:45:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <350a2c1b-4d80-ccfe-b795-f06bcda91b16@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180927045822.GA71203@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>

On 2018/9/27 12:58, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/27, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/9/27 3:49, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 09/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2018/9/26 9:10, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> On 2018/9/26 8:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>> On 09/21, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018/9/21 5:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 09/20, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2018/9/19 1:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This patch avoids BUG_ON when f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO during
>>>>>>>>>> xfstests/generic/475.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> Change log from v1:
>>>>>>>>>>  - propagate errno
>>>>>>>>>>  - drop sum_pages
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       |  2 +-
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/gc.c         |  9 +++++++++
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/node.c       | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/recovery.c   |  2 ++
>>>>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c    |  3 +++
>>>>>>>>>>  6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 01e0d8f5bbbe..1ddf332ce4b2 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -119,11 +119,8 @@ struct page *f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, pgoff_t index)
>>>>>>>>>>  		if (PTR_ERR(page) == -EIO &&
>>>>>>>>>>  				++count <= DEFAULT_RETRY_IO_COUNT)
>>>>>>>>>>  			goto retry;
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>>>>>>>>>> -		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, 1);
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>  	return page;
>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1512,7 +1509,10 @@ int f2fs_write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  	ckpt->checkpoint_ver = cpu_to_le64(++ckpt_ver);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* write cached NAT/SIT entries to NAT/SIT area */
>>>>>>>>>> -	f2fs_flush_nat_entries(sbi, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> +	err = f2fs_flush_nat_entries(sbi, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> +	if (err)
>>>>>>>>>> +		goto stop;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To make sure, if partial NAT pages become dirty, flush them back to device
>>>>>>>>> outside checkpoint() is not harmful, right?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think so.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, one more case, now we use NAT #0, if partial NAT pages were
>>>>>>> writebacked, then we start to use NAT #1, later, in another checkpoint(),
>>>>>>> we update those NAT pages again, we will write them to NAT #0, which is
>>>>>>> belong to last valid checkpoint(), it's may cause corrupted checkpoint in
>>>>>>> scenario of SPO. So it's harmfull, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We already stopped checkpoint anymore, so there'd be no way to proceed another
>>>>>> checkpoint. Am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right, we have called f2fs_stop_checkpoint(), so we are safe now. :)
>>>>
>>>> Can we allow to writeback fs metadata (NAT/SIT/SSA) in prior to checkpoint
>>>> to mitigate IO stress of checkpoint?
>>>
>>> What's the point related to this patch?
>>
>> It's not related to this patch.
>>
>>> Anyway, do you mean f2fs_write_meta_pages is not enough?
>>
>> Yup, f2fs_write_meta_pages can only flush summary pages, I guess we can
>> allow to flush dirty nat/sit entries to NAT/SIT blocks in some conditions,
>> and then flush those block in background.
> 
> I see, then NAT/SIT will be dirtied and flushed during checkpoint. Do you
> mean flushing some of them partially in background, even if we don't know
> it will be flushed again? We may need to gather some data first.

Yes, agreed, let me check that.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe below conditions can be consider to trigger writebacking:
>>>> a) dirty count of meta (NAT/SIT/SSA) exceeds threshold
>>>> b) exceed time threshold
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>  	f2fs_flush_sit_entries(sbi, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* unlock all the fs_lock[] in do_checkpoint() */
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ int f2fs_write_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  		f2fs_release_discard_addrs(sbi);
>>>>>>>>>>  	else
>>>>>>>>>>  		f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> +stop:
>>>>>>>>>>  	unblock_operations(sbi);
>>>>>>>>>>  	stat_inc_cp_count(sbi->stat_info);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>>>>>> index a0c868127a7c..29021dbc8f2a 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ int f2fs_recover_xattr_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *page);
>>>>>>>>>>  int f2fs_recover_inode_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page);
>>>>>>>>>>  int f2fs_restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  			unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum);
>>>>>>>>>> -void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> +int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
>>>>>>>>>>  int f2fs_build_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>>>>>>>>>  void f2fs_destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
>>>>>>>>>>  int __init f2fs_create_node_manager_caches(void);
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 4bcc8a59fdef..c7d14282dbf4 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1070,6 +1070,15 @@ static int do_garbage_collect(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* reference all summary page */
>>>>>>>>>>  	while (segno < end_segno) {
>>>>>>>>>>  		sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, segno++);
>>>>>>>>>> +		if (IS_ERR(sum_page)) {
>>>>>>>>>> +			end_segno = segno - 1;
>>>>>>>>>> +			for (segno = start_segno; segno < end_segno; segno++) {
>>>>>>>>>> +				sum_page = find_get_page(META_MAPPING(sbi),
>>>>>>>>>> +						GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, segno));
>>>>>>>>>> +				f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> find_get_page() will add one more reference on page, so we need to call
>>>>>>>>> f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 0) twice.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +			}
>>>>>>>>>> +			return PTR_ERR(sum_page);
>>>>>>>>>> +		}
>>>>>>>>>>  		unlock_page(sum_page);
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>>>> index fa2381c0bc47..79b6fee354f7 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ static struct page *get_next_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* get current nat block page with lock */
>>>>>>>>>>  	src_page = get_current_nat_page(sbi, nid);
>>>>>>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(src_page))
>>>>>>>>>> +		return src_page;
>>>>>>>>>>  	dst_page = f2fs_grab_meta_page(sbi, dst_off);
>>>>>>>>>>  	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, PageDirty(src_page));
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2265,15 +2267,19 @@ static int __f2fs_build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  						nm_i->nat_block_bitmap)) {
>>>>>>>>>>  			struct page *page = get_current_nat_page(sbi, nid);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> -			ret = scan_nat_page(sbi, page, nid);
>>>>>>>>>> -			f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> +			if (IS_ERR(page)) {
>>>>>>>>>> +				ret = PTR_ERR(page);
>>>>>>>>>> +			} else {
>>>>>>>>>> +				ret = scan_nat_page(sbi, page, nid);
>>>>>>>>>> +				f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> +			}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  			if (ret) {
>>>>>>>>>>  				up_read(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>  				f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !mount);
>>>>>>>>>>  				f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_ERR,
>>>>>>>>>>  					"NAT is corrupt, run fsck to fix it");
>>>>>>>>>> -				return -EINVAL;
>>>>>>>>>> +				return ret;
>>>>>>>>>>  			}
>>>>>>>>>>  		}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2700,7 +2706,7 @@ static void __update_nat_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t start_nid,
>>>>>>>>>>  		__clear_bit_le(nat_index, nm_i->full_nat_bits);
>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> -static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>> +static int __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  		struct nat_entry_set *set, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>>>  	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2724,6 +2730,9 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  		down_write(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
>>>>>>>>>>  	} else {
>>>>>>>>>>  		page = get_next_nat_page(sbi, start_nid);
>>>>>>>>>> +		if (IS_ERR(page))
>>>>>>>>>> +			return PTR_ERR(page);
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>  		nat_blk = page_address(page);
>>>>>>>>>>  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !nat_blk);
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2769,12 +2778,13 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  		radix_tree_delete(&NM_I(sbi)->nat_set_root, set->set);
>>>>>>>>>>  		kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_set_slab, set);
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>> +	return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  /*
>>>>>>>>>>   * This function is called during the checkpointing process.
>>>>>>>>>>   */
>>>>>>>>>> -void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>> +int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>>>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>>>>>>>>>>  	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2784,6 +2794,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  	unsigned int found;
>>>>>>>>>>  	nid_t set_idx = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>  	LIST_HEAD(sets);
>>>>>>>>>> +	int err = 0;
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* during unmount, let's flush nat_bits before checking dirty_nat_cnt */
>>>>>>>>>>  	if (enabled_nat_bits(sbi, cpc)) {
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2793,7 +2804,7 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	if (!nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)
>>>>>>>>>> -		return;
>>>>>>>>>> +		return 0;
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2816,11 +2827,16 @@ void f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* flush dirty nats in nat entry set */
>>>>>>>>>> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &sets, set_list)
>>>>>>>>>> -		__flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &sets, set_list) {
>>>>>>>>>> +		err = __flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
>>>>>>>>>> +		if (err)
>>>>>>>>>> +			break;
>>>>>>>>>> +	}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>>>>>>>>>  	/* Allow dirty nats by node block allocation in write_begin */
>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>> +	return err;
>>>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  static int __get_nat_bitmaps(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 56d34193a74b..ba678efe7cad 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/recovery.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static int check_index_in_prev_nodes(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, segno);
>>>>>>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(sum_page))
>>>>>>>>>> +		return PTR_ERR(sum_page);
>>>>>>>>>>  	sum_node = (struct f2fs_summary_block *)page_address(sum_page);
>>>>>>>>>>  	sum = sum_node->entries[blkoff];
>>>>>>>>>>  	f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>>>>>> index aa96a371aaf8..ab7386a7e9d3 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2487,6 +2487,7 @@ static void change_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>>>>>>>>>  	__next_free_blkoff(sbi, curseg, 0);
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  	sum_page = f2fs_get_sum_page(sbi, new_segno);
>>>>>>>>>> +	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, IS_ERR(sum_page));
>>>>>>>>>>  	sum_node = (struct f2fs_summary_block *)page_address(sum_page);
>>>>>>>>>>  	memcpy(curseg->sum_blk, sum_node, SUM_ENTRY_SIZE);
>>>>>>>>>>  	f2fs_put_page(sum_page, 1);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -3971,6 +3972,8 @@ static int build_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>  			se = &sit_i->sentries[start];
>>>>>>>>>>  			page = get_current_sit_page(sbi, start);
>>>>>>>>>> +			if (IS_ERR(page))
>>>>>>>>>> +				return PTR_ERR(page);
>>>>>>>>>>  			sit_blk = (struct f2fs_sit_block *)page_address(page);
>>>>>>>>>>  			sit = sit_blk->entries[SIT_ENTRY_OFFSET(sit_i, start)];
>>>>>>>>>>  			f2fs_put_page(page, 1);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
> 
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-27  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-18  2:18 [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: report ENOENT correct in f2fs_rename Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18  2:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid f2fs_bug_on if f2fs_get_meta_page_nofail got EIO Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 13:16   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-18 17:55     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-18 17:56   ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19  1:45     ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-19 22:47       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20  6:07     ` Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:46       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21  1:30         ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26  0:18           ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-26  1:10             ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26  8:31               ` Chao Yu
2018-09-26 19:49                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-27  1:14                   ` Chao Yu
2018-09-27  4:58                     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-27  5:45                       ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-09-20 21:48     ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-27 12:09       ` Chao Yu
2018-09-18 12:47 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: report ENOENT correct in f2fs_rename Chao Yu
2018-09-18 17:59   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-19  1:48     ` Chao Yu
2018-09-19  0:47 ` Sahitya Tummala
2018-09-19 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-20  6:14   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2018-09-20 21:35   ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-09-21  1:31     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=350a2c1b-4d80-ccfe-b795-f06bcda91b16@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).