* [PATCH] gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
@ 2018-10-05 13:29 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-10-05 18:51 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2018-10-05 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Bolle, Karsten Keil
Cc: gigaset307x-common, netdev, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
" --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper
"fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c b/drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c
index bc20855..c0cbee0 100644
--- a/drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c
+++ b/drivers/isdn/gigaset/asyncdata.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
cs->respdata[0] = 0;
break;
}
- /* --v-- fall through --v-- */
+ /* fall through */
case '\r':
/* end of message line, pass to response handler */
if (cbytes >= MAX_RESP_SIZE) {
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static unsigned cmd_loop(unsigned numbytes, struct inbuf_t *inbuf)
goto exit;
}
/* quoted or not in DLE mode: treat as regular data */
- /* --v-- fall through --v-- */
+ /* fall through */
default:
/* append to line buffer if possible */
if (cbytes < MAX_RESP_SIZE)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs
2018-10-05 13:29 [PATCH] gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2018-10-05 18:51 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2018-10-05 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gustavo; +Cc: pebolle, isdn, gigaset307x-common, netdev, linux-kernel
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:29:09 +0200
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
> " --v-- fall through --v-- " comment with a proper
> "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364476 ("Missing break in switch")
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1364477 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-05 18:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-05 13:29 [PATCH] gigaset: asyncdata: mark expected switch fall-throughs Gustavo A. R. Silva
2018-10-05 18:51 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).