linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] objtool: move libelf check out of top Makefile
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:25:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016142540.pxlwu3ft6n2b4pgj@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539681053-24388-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 06:10:52PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Another behavioral change is, missing libelf for CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> was previously a warning, but now a error.

This behavioral change should be fine.  It was already an error for
UNWINDER_ORC, so this would only upgrade a warning to an error for
people using STACK_VALIDATION without ORC, which should be a small
number of people by this point.

> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.toolcheck b/scripts/Makefile.toolcheck
> index f3c165d..bc26fc0 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.toolcheck
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.toolcheck
> @@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ include include/config/auto.conf
>  __toolcheck:
>  	@:
>  
> +chk_stack_validation = echo "int main() {}" | $(HOSTCC) -xc -o /dev/null -lelf -
> +msg_stack_validation = "libelf is necessary for building the objtool." \
> +		       "Please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel."
> +toolcheck-$(CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION) += stack_validation
> +
>  PHONY += $(toolcheck-y)
>  __toolcheck: $(toolcheck-y)

This is a nice improvement.

It would probably be a good idea to clarify to the user which config
option(s) are the cause for the error, by putting
"CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION" in the error string, for example.

Though, for this particular case, it would be clearer to have a
different error, based on which option is enabled, like we had before.

Like:


ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC

chk_unwinder_orc = echo "int main() {}" | $(HOSTCC) -xc -o /dev/null -lelf -
msg_unwinder_orc = "Cannot build objtool to generate ORC metadata for CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC=y.  " \
		       "Please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel."
toolcheck-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC) += unwinder_orc

else

chk_stack_validation = echo "int main() {}" | $(HOSTCC) -xc -o /dev/null -lelf -
msg_stack_validation = "Cannot build objtool for CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION=y.  " \
		       "Please install libelf-dev, libelf-devel or elfutils-libelf-devel."
toolcheck-$(CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION) += stack_validation

endif


What do you think?

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-16 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-16  9:10 [PATCH 0/3] kbuild: add scripts/Makefile.toolcheck to check necessary host tools Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: provide a new place " Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16 15:47   ` Sam Ravnborg
2018-10-16  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool: move libelf check out of top Makefile Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16 14:25   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-10-16 15:51     ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16 16:15       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-19  6:04         ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-19 19:28           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-10-16  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] kbuild: check the presence of lzo and lz4 tools when necessary Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-16 19:54   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-17  8:59     ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-17  9:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-10-17  9:25         ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-10-17  9:47           ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181016142540.pxlwu3ft6n2b4pgj@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).