linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow for PAE
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:00:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181025120006.GY30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181025012745.20884-1-rafael.tinoco@linaro.org>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:27:44PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> On 32-bit systems, zsmalloc uses HIGHMEM and, when PAE is enabled, the
> physical frame number might be so big that zsmalloc obj encoding (to
> location) will break IF architecture does not re-define
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, causing:

I think there's a deeper problem here - a misunderstanding of what
MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is.

MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is a definition for sparsemem, and is only visible
when sparsemem is enabled.  When sparsemem is disabled, asm/sparsemem.h
is not included (and should not be included) which means there is no
MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS definition.

I don't think zsmalloc.c should be (ab)using MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, and
your description above makes it sound like you expect it to always be
defined.

If we want to have a definition for this, we shouldn't be playing
fragile games like:

#ifndef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
#ifdef MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
#else
/*
 * If this definition of MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is used, OBJ_INDEX_BITS will just
 * be PAGE_SHIFT
 */
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
#endif
#endif

but instead insist that MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is defined _everywhere_.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-25 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-25  1:27 [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow for PAE Rafael David Tinoco
2018-10-25  1:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: fix zsmalloc ARM LPAE support Rafael David Tinoco
2018-10-25  5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow for PAE Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-25 11:03   ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-10-25 12:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-10-25 12:37   ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-10-25 13:43     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-11-21  0:11       ` [PATCH v2] mm/zsmalloc.c: Fix zsmalloc 32-bit PAE support Rafael David Tinoco
2018-11-21  0:18         ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-11-27 20:33           ` Rafael David Tinoco
2018-11-29  2:53             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-10-25 12:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow for PAE kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181025120006.GY30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=rafael.tinoco@linaro.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).