linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kretprobe: produce sane stack traces
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 13:30:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181103133021.6676708c@vmware.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181104013430.9d3e91b8ebbae7dcb6860ef1@kernel.org>

On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 01:34:30 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > I was thinking of a bitmask that represents the handlers, and use that
> > to map which handler gets called for which shadow entry for a
> > particular task.  
> 
> Hmm, I doubt that is too complicated and not scalable. I rather like to see
> the open shadow entry...

It can scale and not too complex (I already played a little with it).
But that said, I'm not committed to it, and using the shadow stack is
also an interesting idea.

> 
> entry: [[original_retaddr][function][modified_retaddr]]
> 
> So if there are many users on same function, the entries will be like this 
> 
> [[original_return_address][function][trampoline_A]]
> [[trampline_A][function][trampoline_B]]
> [[trampline_B][function][trampoline_C]]
> 
> And on the top of the stack, there is trampline_C instead of original_return_address.
> In this case, return to trampoline_C(), it jumps back to trampline_B() and then
> it jumps back to trampline_A(). And eventually it jumps back to
> original_return_address.

Where are trampolines A, B, and C made? Do we also need to dynamically
create them? If I register multiple function tracing ones, each one
will need its own trampoline?

> 
> This way, we don't need allocate another bitmap/pages for the shadow stack.
> We only need a shadow stack for each task.
> Also, unwinder can easily find the trampline_C from the shadow stack and restores
> original_return_address. (of course trampline_A,B,C must be registered so that
> search function can skip it.)

What I was thinking was to store a count and the functions to be called:


	[original_return_address]
	[function_A]
	[function_B]
	[function_C]
	[ 3 ]

Then the trampoline that processes the return codes for ftrace (and
kretprobes and everyone else) can simply do:

	count = pop_shadow_stack();
	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
		func = pop_shadow_stack();
		func(...);
	}
	return_address = pop_shadow_stack();

That way we only need to register a function to the return handler and
it will be called, without worrying about making trampolines. There
will just be a single trampoline that handles all the work.

-- Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-03 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-01  8:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] kretprobe: produce sane stack traces Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-01  8:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-01 15:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-01 21:13     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-02  3:04       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-02  4:37         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-03 12:47           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-02  0:47   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-02  5:05     ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-02  6:59       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-02 13:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-02 15:43           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-02 16:13             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-03 13:00               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-03 13:13                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-03 16:34                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-03 17:30                     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-11-03 17:33                       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-04  2:25                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-03  7:02           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-04 11:59             ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-06 22:15               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-08  7:46                 ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-08  8:04                   ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-08 14:44                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09  7:26                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-09 15:10                         ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-09  7:15                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-09 15:06                       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-10 15:31                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-12 10:38                           ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-03 13:23           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-02  7:58       ` Aleksa Sarai
2018-11-02  4:01   ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-01  8:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] trace: remove kretprobed checks Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181103133021.6676708c@vmware.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bgregg@netflix.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).