From: Genki Sky <sky@genki.is>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>, lists@nerdbynature.de
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust"
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 12:43:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107.204358.257636196@genki.is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181107184435.GA168339@google.com>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 10:44:37 -0800, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 08:00:36PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On a different tangent: how about the --no-optional-locks (see
> > git(1))? Will this get you your "up-to-date" result without writing to
> > the .git directory? I've only read the documentation, but not tested
> > it.
This option definitely seems to be what we want, good find.
> Unfortunately, --no-optional-locks is new as of git 2.14. Dunno how new
> of a git we expect people to use.
Hmm, I'm not sure who can speak to this.
Though if it's too recent, then based on earlier discussion, it sounds
like something like this (hack) might work best:
[ -w .git ] &&
touch .git/some-file-here 2>/dev/null &&
git update-index --refresh --unmerged >/dev/null
if git diff-index --name-only HEAD | ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 18:10 [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust" Guenter Roeck
2018-11-06 19:23 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-07 2:22 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 2:58 ` Christian Kujau
2018-11-07 3:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-07 4:00 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 18:44 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 20:43 ` Genki Sky [this message]
2018-11-07 20:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-07 21:07 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-07 21:18 ` Doug Anderson
2018-11-07 21:26 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-08 3:16 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-09 2:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 18:34 ` [PATCH] scripts/setlocalversion: Improve -dirty check with git-status --no-optional-locks Brian Norris
2018-11-09 20:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-10 8:58 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-10 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-11-10 20:10 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-11 14:48 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-11 15:03 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-11 17:41 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-11 19:59 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-12 8:42 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-13 0:09 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-13 8:35 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-13 18:32 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-13 19:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Norris
2018-11-13 19:47 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-13 22:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-11-15 2:06 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-15 2:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Brian Norris
2018-11-16 15:17 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-19 14:42 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-13 19:15 ` [PATCH] " Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-09 2:55 ` [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust" Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 16:39 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 16:39 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107.204358.257636196@genki.is \
--to=sky@genki.is \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).