From: Genki Sky <sky@genki.is>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
lists@nerdbynature.de,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust"
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:26:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181107.212646.134137464@genki.is> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Wcxf7p1DyJdVEqODbc6TdTtbPiLszWCAS1xC6=4kkLbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 13:18:19 -0800, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> From reading the thread it sounds like Guenter was not even super
> happy with that based on the principal that you wouldn't expect a
> kernel build to be doing write operations in your .git directory even
> if $objtree == $srctree
I see, thanks.
> In theory you could wrap it. If passing git with
> "--no-optional-locks" doesn't work you could fall back to the old
> code? That would mean only people with newer git would get your new
> feature and everyone else would stick with the pre-existing behavior.
>
> It does seem like any things like this should be done atop Guenter's
> revert. AKA: revert first to get things working the way that they
> were and then start talking about how to make it better.
Okay, it's trading one regression for another, but I guess it's clear
that yours is much more painful. Sorry to have held up progress here.
I'll back out of the discussion until this is reverted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 18:10 [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust" Guenter Roeck
2018-11-06 19:23 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-07 2:22 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 2:58 ` Christian Kujau
2018-11-07 3:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-07 4:00 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 18:44 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-07 20:43 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-07 20:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-07 21:07 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-07 21:18 ` Doug Anderson
2018-11-07 21:26 ` Genki Sky [this message]
2018-11-08 3:16 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-09 2:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 18:34 ` [PATCH] scripts/setlocalversion: Improve -dirty check with git-status --no-optional-locks Brian Norris
2018-11-09 20:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-10 8:58 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-10 10:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-11-10 20:10 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-11 14:48 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-11 15:03 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-11 17:41 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-11 19:59 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-12 8:42 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-13 0:09 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-13 8:35 ` Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-13 18:32 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-13 19:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Brian Norris
2018-11-13 19:47 ` Genki Sky
2018-11-13 22:03 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-11-15 2:06 ` Brian Norris
2018-11-15 2:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Brian Norris
2018-11-16 15:17 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-19 14:42 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-13 19:15 ` [PATCH] " Alexander Kapshuk
2018-11-09 2:55 ` [PATCH] Revert "scripts/setlocalversion: git: Make -dirty check more robust" Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 16:39 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-11-09 16:39 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181107.212646.134137464@genki.is \
--to=sky@genki.is \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).