linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling
@ 2018-11-01 20:02 Florian Fainelli
  2018-11-07 19:37 ` Florian Fainelli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2018-11-01 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: stable, gregkh, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Michael Kerrisk,
	Florian Fainelli, John Stultz

From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 78c9c4dfbf8c04883941445a195276bb4bb92c76 ]

The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding functions
can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int. As a
consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
random number generators.

The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.

Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to user space
via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a positive value
between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
overrun value has been clamped.

Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
[florian: Make patch apply to v4.9.135]
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
Thomas, can you review for correctness? Thanks!

 include/linux/posix-timers.h   |  4 ++--
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c |  2 +-
 kernel/time/posix-timers.c     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/posix-timers.h b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
index 62d44c176071..e4b8678183f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
+++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ struct k_itimer {
 	spinlock_t it_lock;
 	clockid_t it_clock;		/* which timer type */
 	timer_t it_id;			/* timer id */
-	int it_overrun;			/* overrun on pending signal  */
-	int it_overrun_last;		/* overrun on last delivered signal */
+	s64 it_overrun;			/* overrun on pending signal  */
+	s64 it_overrun_last;		/* overrun on last delivered signal */
 	int it_requeue_pending;		/* waiting to requeue this timer */
 #define REQUEUE_PENDING 1
 	int it_sigev_notify;		/* notify word of sigevent struct */
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 39008d78927a..21a27bb73587 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void bump_cpu_timer(struct k_itimer *timer,
 			continue;
 
 		timer->it.cpu.expires += incr;
-		timer->it_overrun += 1 << i;
+		timer->it_overrun += 1LL << i;
 		delta -= incr;
 	}
 }
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
index fc7c37ad90a0..0e6ed2e7d066 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -355,6 +355,17 @@ static __init int init_posix_timers(void)
 
 __initcall(init_posix_timers);
 
+/*
+ * The siginfo si_overrun field and the return value of timer_getoverrun(2)
+ * are of type int. Clamp the overrun value to INT_MAX
+ */
+static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr, int baseval)
+{
+	s64 sum = timr->it_overrun_last + (s64)baseval;
+
+	return sum > (s64)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)sum;
+}
+
 static void schedule_next_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
 {
 	struct hrtimer *timer = &timr->it.real.timer;
@@ -362,12 +373,11 @@ static void schedule_next_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
 	if (timr->it.real.interval.tv64 == 0)
 		return;
 
-	timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int) hrtimer_forward(timer,
-						timer->base->get_time(),
-						timr->it.real.interval);
+	timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, timer->base->get_time(),
+					    timr->it.real.interval);
 
 	timr->it_overrun_last = timr->it_overrun;
-	timr->it_overrun = -1;
+	timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
 	++timr->it_requeue_pending;
 	hrtimer_restart(timer);
 }
@@ -396,7 +406,7 @@ void do_schedule_next_timer(struct siginfo *info)
 		else
 			schedule_next_timer(timr);
 
-		info->si_overrun += timr->it_overrun_last;
+		info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, info->si_overrun);
 	}
 
 	if (timr)
@@ -491,8 +501,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart posix_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
 					now = ktime_add(now, kj);
 			}
 #endif
-			timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int)
-				hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
+			timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
 						timr->it.real.interval);
 			ret = HRTIMER_RESTART;
 			++timr->it_requeue_pending;
@@ -633,7 +642,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(timer_create, const clockid_t, which_clock,
 	it_id_set = IT_ID_SET;
 	new_timer->it_id = (timer_t) new_timer_id;
 	new_timer->it_clock = which_clock;
-	new_timer->it_overrun = -1;
+	new_timer->it_overrun = -1LL;
 
 	if (timer_event_spec) {
 		if (copy_from_user(&event, timer_event_spec, sizeof (event))) {
@@ -762,7 +771,7 @@ common_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timr, struct itimerspec *cur_setting)
 	 */
 	if (iv.tv64 && (timr->it_requeue_pending & REQUEUE_PENDING ||
 			timr->it_sigev_notify == SIGEV_NONE))
-		timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int) hrtimer_forward(timer, now, iv);
+		timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now, iv);
 
 	remaining = __hrtimer_expires_remaining_adjusted(timer, now);
 	/* Return 0 only, when the timer is expired and not pending */
@@ -824,7 +833,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_getoverrun, timer_t, timer_id)
 	if (!timr)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	overrun = timr->it_overrun_last;
+	overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, 0);
 	unlock_timer(timr, flags);
 
 	return overrun;
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling
  2018-11-01 20:02 [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling Florian Fainelli
@ 2018-11-07 19:37 ` Florian Fainelli
  2018-11-08  6:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2018-11-07 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, John Stultz
  Cc: stable, gregkh, Peter Zijlstra, Michael Kerrisk

On 11/1/18 1:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> 
> [ Upstream commit 78c9c4dfbf8c04883941445a195276bb4bb92c76 ]
> 
> The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding functions
> can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int. As a
> consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
> random number generators.
> 
> The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
> k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
> accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.
> 
> Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to user space
> via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a positive value
> between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
> overrun value has been clamped.
> 
> Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
> [florian: Make patch apply to v4.9.135]
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> Thomas, can you review for correctness? Thanks!

Thomas, John, does that look like a reasonable backport for 4.9?

> 
>  include/linux/posix-timers.h   |  4 ++--
>  kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c |  2 +-
>  kernel/time/posix-timers.c     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/posix-timers.h b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> index 62d44c176071..e4b8678183f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> +++ b/include/linux/posix-timers.h
> @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ struct k_itimer {
>  	spinlock_t it_lock;
>  	clockid_t it_clock;		/* which timer type */
>  	timer_t it_id;			/* timer id */
> -	int it_overrun;			/* overrun on pending signal  */
> -	int it_overrun_last;		/* overrun on last delivered signal */
> +	s64 it_overrun;			/* overrun on pending signal  */
> +	s64 it_overrun_last;		/* overrun on last delivered signal */
>  	int it_requeue_pending;		/* waiting to requeue this timer */
>  #define REQUEUE_PENDING 1
>  	int it_sigev_notify;		/* notify word of sigevent struct */
> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> index 39008d78927a..21a27bb73587 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void bump_cpu_timer(struct k_itimer *timer,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		timer->it.cpu.expires += incr;
> -		timer->it_overrun += 1 << i;
> +		timer->it_overrun += 1LL << i;
>  		delta -= incr;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> index fc7c37ad90a0..0e6ed2e7d066 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
> @@ -355,6 +355,17 @@ static __init int init_posix_timers(void)
>  
>  __initcall(init_posix_timers);
>  
> +/*
> + * The siginfo si_overrun field and the return value of timer_getoverrun(2)
> + * are of type int. Clamp the overrun value to INT_MAX
> + */
> +static inline int timer_overrun_to_int(struct k_itimer *timr, int baseval)
> +{
> +	s64 sum = timr->it_overrun_last + (s64)baseval;
> +
> +	return sum > (s64)INT_MAX ? INT_MAX : (int)sum;
> +}
> +
>  static void schedule_next_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
>  {
>  	struct hrtimer *timer = &timr->it.real.timer;
> @@ -362,12 +373,11 @@ static void schedule_next_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
>  	if (timr->it.real.interval.tv64 == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int) hrtimer_forward(timer,
> -						timer->base->get_time(),
> -						timr->it.real.interval);
> +	timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, timer->base->get_time(),
> +					    timr->it.real.interval);
>  
>  	timr->it_overrun_last = timr->it_overrun;
> -	timr->it_overrun = -1;
> +	timr->it_overrun = -1LL;
>  	++timr->it_requeue_pending;
>  	hrtimer_restart(timer);
>  }
> @@ -396,7 +406,7 @@ void do_schedule_next_timer(struct siginfo *info)
>  		else
>  			schedule_next_timer(timr);
>  
> -		info->si_overrun += timr->it_overrun_last;
> +		info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, info->si_overrun);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (timr)
> @@ -491,8 +501,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart posix_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
>  					now = ktime_add(now, kj);
>  			}
>  #endif
> -			timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int)
> -				hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
> +			timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now,
>  						timr->it.real.interval);
>  			ret = HRTIMER_RESTART;
>  			++timr->it_requeue_pending;
> @@ -633,7 +642,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(timer_create, const clockid_t, which_clock,
>  	it_id_set = IT_ID_SET;
>  	new_timer->it_id = (timer_t) new_timer_id;
>  	new_timer->it_clock = which_clock;
> -	new_timer->it_overrun = -1;
> +	new_timer->it_overrun = -1LL;
>  
>  	if (timer_event_spec) {
>  		if (copy_from_user(&event, timer_event_spec, sizeof (event))) {
> @@ -762,7 +771,7 @@ common_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timr, struct itimerspec *cur_setting)
>  	 */
>  	if (iv.tv64 && (timr->it_requeue_pending & REQUEUE_PENDING ||
>  			timr->it_sigev_notify == SIGEV_NONE))
> -		timr->it_overrun += (unsigned int) hrtimer_forward(timer, now, iv);
> +		timr->it_overrun += hrtimer_forward(timer, now, iv);
>  
>  	remaining = __hrtimer_expires_remaining_adjusted(timer, now);
>  	/* Return 0 only, when the timer is expired and not pending */
> @@ -824,7 +833,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(timer_getoverrun, timer_t, timer_id)
>  	if (!timr)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	overrun = timr->it_overrun_last;
> +	overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr, 0);
>  	unlock_timer(timr, flags);
>  
>  	return overrun;
> 


-- 
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling
  2018-11-07 19:37 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2018-11-08  6:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
  2018-11-08 15:46     ` Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2018-11-08  6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Florian Fainelli
  Cc: linux-kernel, John Stultz, stable, gregkh, Peter Zijlstra,
	Michael Kerrisk

Florian,

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/1/18 1:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > 
> > [ Upstream commit 78c9c4dfbf8c04883941445a195276bb4bb92c76 ]
> > 
> > The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding functions
> > can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int. As a
> > consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
> > random number generators.
> > 
> > The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
> > k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
> > accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.
> > 
> > Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to user space
> > via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a positive value
> > between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
> > overrun value has been clamped.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
> > [florian: Make patch apply to v4.9.135]
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Thomas, can you review for correctness? Thanks!
> 
> Thomas, John, does that look like a reasonable backport for 4.9?

Looks correct.

Thanks,

	tglx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling
  2018-11-08  6:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2018-11-08 15:46     ` Sasha Levin
  2018-11-08 22:36       ` Florian Fainelli
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2018-11-08 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: Florian Fainelli, linux-kernel, John Stultz, stable, gregkh,
	Peter Zijlstra, Michael Kerrisk

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:48:16AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>Florian,
>
>On Wed, 7 Nov 2018, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 11/1/18 1:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> >
>> > [ Upstream commit 78c9c4dfbf8c04883941445a195276bb4bb92c76 ]
>> >
>> > The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding functions
>> > can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int. As a
>> > consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
>> > random number generators.
>> >
>> > The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
>> > k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
>> > accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.
>> >
>> > Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to user space
>> > via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a positive value
>> > between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
>> > overrun value has been clamped.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> > Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> > Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
>> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
>> > [florian: Make patch apply to v4.9.135]
>> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > Thomas, can you review for correctness? Thanks!
>>
>> Thomas, John, does that look like a reasonable backport for 4.9?
>
>Looks correct.

Queued for 4.9, thanks all.

--
Thanks,
Sasha

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling
  2018-11-08 15:46     ` Sasha Levin
@ 2018-11-08 22:36       ` Florian Fainelli
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2018-11-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sasha Levin, Thomas Gleixner
  Cc: linux-kernel, John Stultz, stable, gregkh, Peter Zijlstra,
	Michael Kerrisk

On 11/8/18 7:46 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 07:48:16AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Florian,
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 11/1/18 1:02 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> >
>>> > [ Upstream commit 78c9c4dfbf8c04883941445a195276bb4bb92c76 ]
>>> >
>>> > The posix timer overrun handling is broken because the forwarding
>>> functions
>>> > can return a huge number of overruns which does not fit in an int.
>>> As a
>>> > consequence timer_getoverrun(2) and siginfo::si_overrun can turn into
>>> > random number generators.
>>> >
>>> > The k_clock::timer_forward() callbacks return a 64 bit value now. Make
>>> > k_itimer::ti_overrun[_last] 64bit as well, so the kernel internal
>>> > accounting is correct. 3Remove the temporary (int) casts.
>>> >
>>> > Add a helper function which clamps the overrun value returned to
>>> user space
>>> > via timer_getoverrun(2) or siginfo::si_overrun limited to a
>>> positive value
>>> > between 0 and INT_MAX. INT_MAX is an indicator for user space that the
>>> > overrun value has been clamped.
>>> >
>>> > Reported-by: Team OWL337 <icytxw@gmail.com>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> > Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>> > Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
>>> > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180626132705.018623573@linutronix.de
>>> > [florian: Make patch apply to v4.9.135]
>>> > Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>> > ---
>>> > Thomas, can you review for correctness? Thanks!
>>>
>>> Thomas, John, does that look like a reasonable backport for 4.9?
>>
>> Looks correct.
> 
> Queued for 4.9, thanks all.

Thanks, the same patch should be applicable to earlier kernel versions
as well with little to no hunks. At least I applied it as far back as
4.1 so far. I could provide a patch for earlier kernels that did not
have the file renaming.
-- 
Florian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-08 22:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-11-01 20:02 [PATCH stable 4.9] posix-timers: Sanitize overrun handling Florian Fainelli
2018-11-07 19:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-11-08  6:48   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-11-08 15:46     ` Sasha Levin
2018-11-08 22:36       ` Florian Fainelli

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).