linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: utilize two queue maps, one for reads and one for writes
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:52:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181114045237.GA6456@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1e91342-2b04-6d9f-e77a-6e812c6888d0@kernel.dk>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 05:51:08PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/13/18 5:41 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:36:31AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> NVMe does round-robin between queues by default, which means that
> >> sharing a queue map for both reads and writes can be problematic
> >> in terms of read servicing. It's much easier to flood the queue
> >> with writes and reduce the read servicing.
> >>
> >> Implement two queue maps, one for reads and one for writes. The
> >> write queue count is configurable through the 'write_queues'
> >> parameter.
> >>
> >> By default, we retain the previous behavior of having a single
> >> queue set, shared between reads and writes. Setting 'write_queues'
> >> to a non-zero value will create two queue sets, one for reads and
> >> one for writes, the latter using the configurable number of
> >> queues (hardware queue counts permitting).
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > 
> > This patch causes hangs when running recent versions of
> > -next with several architectures; see the -next column at
> > kerneltests.org/builders for details.  Bisect log below; this
> > was run with qemu on alpha. Reverting this patch as well as
> > "nvme: add separate poll queue map" fixes the problem.
> 
> I don't see anything related to what hung, the trace, and so on.
> Can you clue me in? Where are the test results with dmesg?
> 
alpha just stalls during boot. parisc reports a hung task
in nvme_reset_work. sparc64 reports EIO when instantiating
the nvme driver, called from nvme_reset_work, and then stalls.
In all three cases, reverting the two mentioned patches fixes
the problem.

https://kerneltests.org/builders/qemu-parisc-next/builds/173/steps/qemubuildcommand_1/logs/stdio

is an example log for parisc.

I didn't check if the other boot failures (ppc looks bad)
have the same root cause.

> How to reproduce?
> 
parisc:

qemu-system-hppa -kernel vmlinux -no-reboot \
	-snapshot -device nvme,serial=foo,drive=d0 \
	-drive file=rootfs.ext2,if=none,format=raw,id=d0 \
	-append 'root=/dev/nvme0n1 rw rootwait panic=-1 console=ttyS0,115200 ' \
	-nographic -monitor null

alpha:

qemu-system-alpha -M clipper -kernel arch/alpha/boot/vmlinux -no-reboot \
	-snapshot -device nvme,serial=foo,drive=d0 \
	-drive file=rootfs.ext2,if=none,format=raw,id=d0 \
	-append 'root=/dev/nvme0n1 rw rootwait panic=-1 console=ttyS0' \
	-m 128M -nographic -monitor null -serial stdio

sparc64:

qemu-system-sparc64 -M sun4u -cpu 'TI UltraSparc IIi' -m 512 \
	-snapshot -device nvme,serial=foo,drive=d0,bus=pciB \
	-drive file=rootfs.ext2,if=none,format=raw,id=d0 \
	-kernel arch/sparc/boot/image -no-reboot \
	-append 'root=/dev/nvme0n1 rw rootwait panic=-1 console=ttyS0' \
	-nographic -monitor none

The root file systems are available from the respective subdirectories
of:

https://github.com/groeck/linux-build-test/tree/master/rootfs

Guenter

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-14  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-14  0:41 [PATCH] nvme: utilize two queue maps, one for reads and one for writes Guenter Roeck
2018-11-14  0:51 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-14  1:28   ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14  1:36     ` Mike Snitzer
2018-11-14  4:52   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-11-14 17:12     ` [PATCH] " Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 18:28 Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 18:38 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 19:11 Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 19:29 ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 19:38   ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 19:40     ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 19:43       ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 22:06         ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 22:12           ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 19:36 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 19:39   ` Jens Axboe
2018-11-15 22:46 Guenter Roeck
2018-11-15 23:03 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181114045237.GA6456@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).