linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: tests: Disable breakpoint tests on ARM (32-bit)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:31:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127003126.25094-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com> (raw)

breakpoint tests on the ARM 32-bit kernel are broken in several ways.

The breakpoint length requested does not necessarily match whether the
function address has the Thumb bit (bit 0) set or not, and this does
matter to the ARM kernel hw_breakpoint infrastructure. See [1] for
background.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/15/205

As Will indicated, the overflow handling would require single-stepping
which is not supported at the moment. Just disable those tests for the
ARM 32-bit platforms.

Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:

- Fix comment above test per Will's feedback

 tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
index a467615c5a0e..05bf06f84a3b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
@@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ int test__bp_signal(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused
 bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
 {
 /*
- * The powerpc so far does not have support to even create
+ * powerpc, s390 and arm so far does not have support to even create
  * instruction breakpoint using the perf event interface.
  * Once it's there we can release this.
  */
-#if defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__s390x__)
+#if defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__arm__)
 	return false;
 #else
 	return true;
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27  0:31 Florian Fainelli [this message]
2018-11-27 19:30 ` [PATCH v2] perf: tests: Disable breakpoint tests on ARM (32-bit) Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181127003126.25094-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).