linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf: tests: Disable breakpoint tests on ARM (32-bit)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 19:30:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181127193028.GC5641@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181127003126.25094-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:31:23PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> breakpoint tests on the ARM 32-bit kernel are broken in several ways.
> 
> The breakpoint length requested does not necessarily match whether the
> function address has the Thumb bit (bit 0) set or not, and this does
> matter to the ARM kernel hw_breakpoint infrastructure. See [1] for
> background.
> 
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/15/205
> 
> As Will indicated, the overflow handling would require single-stepping
> which is not supported at the moment. Just disable those tests for the
> ARM 32-bit platforms.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> 
> - Fix comment above test per Will's feedback
> 
>  tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> index a467615c5a0e..05bf06f84a3b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bp_signal.c
> @@ -292,11 +292,11 @@ int test__bp_signal(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused
>  bool test__bp_signal_is_supported(void)
>  {
>  /*
> - * The powerpc so far does not have support to even create
> + * powerpc, s390 and arm so far does not have support to even create
>   * instruction breakpoint using the perf event interface.
>   * Once it's there we can release this.

Sorry, Florian, but I still think this comment is bogus since you can
create instruction breakpoints via perf on arm. I think you need
something like:

	/*
	 * PowerPC and S390 do not support creation of instruction
	 * breakpoints using the perf_event interface.
	 *
	 * ARM requires explicit rounding down of the instruction
	 * pointer in Thumb mode, and then requires the single-step
	 * to be handled explicitly in the overflow handler to avoid
	 * stepping into the SIGIO handler and getting stuck on the
	 * breakpointed instruction.
	 *
	 * Just disable the test for these architectures until these
	 * issues are resolved.
	 */

Will

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-27  0:31 [PATCH v2] perf: tests: Disable breakpoint tests on ARM (32-bit) Florian Fainelli
2018-11-27 19:30 ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181127193028.GC5641@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).