linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Burton <pburton@wavecomp.com>,
	Daniel Jedrychowski <avistel@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again"
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 21:39:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181216213901.hpll7wqzhqvfgkfy@pburton-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93a3c76b-f4ba-57ae-9d80-6e945b4f3181@denx.de>

Hi Marek,

On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 10:08:48PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > I did suggest an alternative approach which would rename
> > serial8250_clear_fifos() and split it into 2 variants - one that
> > disables FIFOs & one that does not, then use the latter in
> > __do_stop_tx_rs485():
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181213014805.77u5dzydo23cm6fq@pburton-laptop/
> > 
> > However I have no access to the OMAP3 hardware that Marek's patch was
> > attempting to fix & have heard nothing back with regards to him testing
> > that approach, so here's a simple revert that fixes the Ingenic JZ4780.
> > 
> > I've marked for stable back to v4.10 presuming that this is how far the
> > broken patch may be backported, given that this is where commit
> > 2bed8a8e7072 ("Clearing FIFOs in RS485 emulation mode causes subsequent
> > transmits to break") that it tried to fix was introduced.
> 
> OK, I tested this on AM335x / OMAP3 and the system is again broken, so
> that's a NAK.

To be clear - what did you test? This revert or the patch linked to
above?

This revert would of course reintroduce your RS485 issue because it just
undoes your change.

Either way, commit f6aa5beb45be ("serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in
RS485 mode again") breaks systems that worked before it so at this late
stage in the 4.20 cycle a revert would make sense to me. If that breaks
RS85 on OMAP3 then my question would be how much can anyone really care
if nobody noticed since v4.10? And why should that lead to you breaking
the JZ4780 which has been discovered before a stable kernel release
includes the breakage?

Thanks,
    Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-16 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-13  0:41 [PATCH] serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again Paul Burton
2018-12-13  0:55 ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-13  1:48   ` Paul Burton
2018-12-13  2:27     ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-13  3:33       ` Paul Burton
2018-12-13  4:18         ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-13  5:11           ` Paul Burton
2018-12-13 14:51             ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-13 17:48               ` Paul Burton
2018-12-16 20:10                 ` [PATCH] Revert "serial: 8250: Fix clearing FIFOs in RS485 mode again" Paul Burton
2018-12-16 20:32                   ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 21:31                     ` Paul Burton
2018-12-16 21:45                       ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 21:52                         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-16 22:11                           ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 22:24                           ` Paul Burton
2018-12-16 22:28                             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-16 22:35                               ` Paul Burton
2018-12-17 15:18                                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-12-17 15:43                                   ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-17 16:30                                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2018-12-17 17:20                                   ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-19  0:12                                     ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 22:16                         ` Paul Burton
2018-12-16 21:08                   ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 21:39                     ` Paul Burton [this message]
2018-12-16 22:01                       ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-16 22:28                         ` Paul Burton
2018-12-21 20:08                           ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-21 21:08                             ` Paul Burton
2018-12-21 22:02                               ` Marek Vasut
2018-12-24 15:43                                 ` Paul Burton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181216213901.hpll7wqzhqvfgkfy@pburton-laptop \
    --to=paul.burton@mips.com \
    --cc=avistel@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=pburton@wavecomp.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).