linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:22:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123092245.GB14010@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123091016.GA15019@brain-police>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:10:18AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:21:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
> > 
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/locking/qspinlock_stat.h | 18 ++++--------------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> Curious, but are you planning to make these functions return void after
> you've modified all of the callers?

I wish, but I can't, as those values are needed for some other debugfs
calls.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2019-01-23  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-22 15:21 [PATCH] qspinlock: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-23  8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-01  9:12   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-01-23  9:10 ` Will Deacon
2019-01-23  9:22   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190123092245.GB14010@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).