linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" <Haibo.Xu@arm.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	"jdike@addtoit.com" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
	"Bin Lu (Arm Technology China)" <Bin.Lu@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:12:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190304101205.GA1504@e107155-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb9ef619-4af8-71e1-5aee-0b6294ac488b@arm.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:25:28AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On 2019/3/1 2:32, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Now that we have a new hook ptrace_syscall_enter that can be called from
> > syscall entry code and it handles PTRACE_SYSEMU in generic code, we
> > can do some cleanup using the same in syscall_trace_enter.
> > 
> > Further the extra logic to find single stepping PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP
> > in syscall_slow_exit_work seems unnecessary. Let's remove the same.
> 
> I think we should not change the logic here. Is so, it will double the report of syscall
> when PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP is enabled.
>

I don't think that should happen, but I may be missing something.
Can you explain how ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-04 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-28 18:32 [PATCH 0/6] ptrace: consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add support for arm64 Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] ptrace: introduce ptrace_syscall_enter to consolidate PTRACE_SYSEMU handling Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04  8:03   ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:46     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04 12:23       ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-03-04 12:27         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Sudeep Holla
2019-03-03  1:11   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-04 10:07     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04  8:25   ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:12     ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-03-05  2:14       ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-11 18:34         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-12  1:34           ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12  3:04             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-12 12:09               ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-13  1:03                 ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-14 10:51                   ` Sudeep Holla
2019-03-15  5:48                     ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-12 12:05             ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: use common ptrace_syscall_enter hook to handle _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU Sudeep Holla
2019-03-04  9:36   ` Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)
2019-03-04 10:42     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers Sudeep Holla
2019-02-28 18:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190304101205.GA1504@e107155-lin \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=Bin.Lu@arm.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Haibo.Xu@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).